Hi, As I’m preparing ActiveMQ 5.17.0 with lot of changes, I plan to include docker image there.
Regards JB > Le 17 mars 2021 à 09:26, Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Any update on this? > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 00:30 Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I feel like we are stuck again on Infra. >> >> On the clone for artemis someone suggested asking for help in >> build.Apache.org which I then answered we just need help and authorization >> to upload stuff >> >> >> Anyone have any insight!? >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:33 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Not yet. INFRA has assigned that task, but not taken any action on the >>> request. I’ll nudge for an update. >>> >>>> On Feb 24, 2021, at 12:21 PM, Clebert Suconic < >> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Do you have a Jenkins job already aligned to build it ? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:19 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I’m prepping the PR for 5.17.0. Please provide feedback on the JIRA. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 24, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Any update on this? I've just seen that Victor Romero archived his >>>>>> unofficial docker image. :( >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 4:57 PM Clebert Suconic < >>>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm following up on that JIRA ticket. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:57 AM Clebert Suconic >>>>>>> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Matt, I thought you already had some information about >> changes >>>>>>>> on Infra. I had misunderstood you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:33 AM Matt Pavlovich < >> mattr...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Clebert- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I do not have all the info yet, INFRA has assigned the ticket but >>> not >>>>>>> started working on it =) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Matt >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2021, at 9:25 AM, Clebert Suconic < >>>>>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I tried to follow the JIRA on Infra and I did not see much >>>>>>> information about it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What's the procedure to upload images? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The only thing I saw was this JIRA: But it seemed you would be >>>>>>>>>> uploading images manually? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21430 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Isn't there an official way to provide the images? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In artemis we have a docker module where you would build the >>> binaries >>>>>>>>>> and create the image. We would just need to add that to a Jenkins >>>>>>>>>> build and produce an image whenever a tag is created. >>>>>>>>>> I suppose ActiveMQ branch would do the same... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How this is supposed to work? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> thank you >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 4:13 PM Matt Pavlovich < >> mattr...@gmail.com >>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The initial features list and notes in the JIRA reflect this >>>>>>> approach. I’ll start on the module and push a PR this weekend. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2021, at 2:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre < >>> j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I agree, I think it’s the most convenient approach. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, at Karaf, I maintain a Dockerfile as part of the >>>>>>> codebase: >>> https://github.com/apache/karaf/tree/master/assemblies/docker >>>>> < >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/karaf/tree/master/assemblies/docker> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As part of a Karaf release, I’m pushing Karaf docker image. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> However, anyone can start from the Karaf Dockerfile to create >>>>>>> their own one (we also provide a goal on the karaf-maven-plugin to >> do >>>>> so). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think ActiveMQ (at least classic) should just provide a >>>>>>> Dockerfile (or a set) and push "official" docker images. But still >>>>> letting >>>>>>> people to create their own. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 17 févr. 2021 à 19:51, Hossack, Etienne >>>>>>> <ehoss...@amazon.com.INVALID> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Following this discussion with interest, since I greatly enjoy >>>>>>> the portability and consistency that Docker provides. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some questions about the Dockerfile linked above that >>>>>>> might be best served in a code review, but a more holistic question >> I >>>>>>> wanted to ask: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Does ActiveMQ need to publish the Dockerfile? >>>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, simply defining the image then documenting its >>>>>>> location (README, website) and how to use it would add value to many >>>>>>> consumers. >>>>>>>>>>>>> That way: >>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Dockerfile code can live within the ActiveMQ repository >>> and >>>>>>> be close to the code >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Anyone who wishes to consume the dockerfile can (Apache 2.0 >>>>>>> license) through their own build process >>>>>>>>>>>>> * The ActiveMQ community does not need to maintain any >>> additional >>>>>>> infrastructure, release process, repositories, dependencies. >>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Dockerfile can and should be independent of particular >>>>>>> binaries < >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/#env >>>>>> >>>>>>> whenever possible, but even if not, this way each active branch >> would >>> be >>>>>>> the source of truth for a functioning Dockerfile (can build and run >>>>> tests >>>>>>> on the version), and no incremental versions would have to be >>> published. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we could gain lots of value for little investment this >>>>>>> way. What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Étienne >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. should I add the questions on the JIRA ticket as well? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Étienne Hossack >>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Development Engineer, Amazon MQ >>>>>>>>>>>>> email: ehoss...@amazon.com <mailto:ehoss...@amazon.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> phone: +1-778-945-8287 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Clebert Suconic < >>>>>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com <mailto:clebert.suco...@gmail.com>> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the >>> organization. >>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the >>> sender >>>>>>> and know the content is safe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice to do the same with Artemis... we already >> have >>>>>>> scripts to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build the images as part of the build.. we just don't have >> the >>>>>>> builds yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:36 AM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jenki...@nationwide.com <mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quick introduction: My name is Rod. I work with Chuck. I >> am >>>>>>> stepping in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while he is out. I am the coworker who does the TomEE >> images. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a question on the tarballs on >>> https://archive.apache.org >>>>>>> <https://archive.apache.org/> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repo1.maven.org <https://repo1.maven.org/>. I >>> noticed >>>>>>> that the images are not the same SHA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not the same size. Is there a reason for that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, the Dockerfile is mostly complete, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16/jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16/jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the only thing left was getting the maven download >> to >>>>>>> work as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fallback to the other repos. I can still make that work, >> but >>> I >>>>>>> thought it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was strange to see a difference in the sizes of the files. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is what we are proposing. I am going to start on the >>>>>>> other options >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> later today. We would be happy for any feedback. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From: *"Shank, Charles R" <shan...@nationwide.com <mailto: >>>>>>> shan...@nationwide.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 8:49 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To: *Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto: >>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net>>, Matt Pavlovich < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mattr...@gmail.com <mailto:mattr...@gmail.com>>, " >>>>>>> dev@activemq.apache.org <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>" < >>>>>>> dev@activemq.apache.org <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc: *"Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" <jenki...@nationwide.com >>>>>>> <mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree we should make this its own issue and open up the >>>>>>> discussion to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ActiveMQ community >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, we are working on the following repository to >>>>>>> provide generic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> images available to the ActiveMQ community. You can follow >>> our >>>>>>> progress >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here: *https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq < >>>>>>> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq < >>>>>>> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq>>* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because the needs of the community are varied, we recommend >>>>>>> making >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple versions of ActiveMQ classic and Artemis. The >> repos >>>>>>> also will be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created to include OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. We also >>> recommend >>>>>>> leaving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> room for other operating systems other than Debian and >>> multiple >>>>>>> versions of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDK within both OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given the number of options, we are not sure how we would go >>>>>>> about using a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> module to maintain the dockerfiles, but would be open to >> it. >>>>>>> Once we get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our dockerimages complete, we can discuss how they are >>>>>>> maintained going >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward. We will also investigate with the folks at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/docker-library < >>>>>>> https://github.com/docker-library> to see what is required to get >>> our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> images listed as the official images. I have a coworker >> that >>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for the TomEE official images and has some >>> contacts >>>>>>> there. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We would like to get the communities thoughts and input on >>> this >>>>>>> course of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> action. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chuck Shank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: cid:image001.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0 >>>>>>> <cid:image001.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0>] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: cid:image002.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0 >>>>>>> <cid:image002.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0>] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >>> >>> -- >> Clebert Suconic >>
