Hello Havret- Yes, I am still planning a PR for the Docker image shortly. A number of prerequisite fixes went in recently as part of the 5.16.3 release (maven plugin versions, updated JDK support, etc).
Thanks! Matt Pavlovich > On Aug 16, 2021, at 2:55 PM, Havret <hav...@apache.org> wrote: > > Any update on this? > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 4:39 PM Shank, Charles R <shan...@nationwide.com> > wrote: > >> My co-worker and I were wondering if anyone has had a chance to review our >> sample docker image at >> >> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16/jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile >> >> We saw where Matt Pavlovich was added to the Docker hub >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21430 >> >> And I was wondering what the plan was to get our image added to Docker >> hub? Or if the community have other plans? >> >> Was looking to see what the next steps will be to move forward on having a >> standard docker image for ActiveMQ >> >> Thanks for your feedback on this issue >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Arthur Naseef <a...@amlinv.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:39 PM >> To: dev@activemq.apache.org >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ >> >> Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use >> CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. >> (Sender: dev-return-72333-SHANKC1=nationwide....@activemq.apache.org) >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> I keep seeing mention of having multiple variations of docker images using >> different base images and some thoughts come to mind. >> >> Here are my thoughts: >> >> - Docker staged builds make it easy to copy specific contents from one >> base image into a new one, leaving behind unwanted content (e.g. O/S or >> JDK >> specifics) >> - If the ActiveMQ-specific parts are placed in dedicated directories, >> copying them out to new images would be straight forward >> - Of couse, the number of combinations folks will want can grow to >> unmaintainable levels quickly >> - Having official image(s) that are functional, and provide a >> "quick-start" to meet the following use-cases would be great value >> across >> the board: >> - New user spinning up a broker to learn/experiment >> - Build/Test pipeline ephemeral broker for application testing >> purposes >> - Docker containers have many means to gain access to additional tooling >> not built-into an image >> - Because of this, having a minimal container is not overly-limiting >> - Of course, getting tools working with a process in a docker >> container can be challenging (e.g. not everyone will be comfortable >> to use >> nsenter), so some basic tools may be good to have >> - Providing a basic, well-structured image enables more complex >> use-cases without having to clean-up / undo more advanced >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> Art >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 1:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> As I’m preparing ActiveMQ 5.17.0 with lot of changes, I plan to >>> include docker image there. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>>> Le 17 mars 2021 à 09:26, Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Any update on this? >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 00:30 Clebert Suconic >>>> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I feel like we are stuck again on Infra. >>>>> >>>>> On the clone for artemis someone suggested asking for help in >>>>> build.Apache.org which I then answered we just need help and >>> authorization >>>>> to upload stuff >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Anyone have any insight!? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:33 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Not yet. INFRA has assigned that task, but not taken any action on >>>>>> the request. I’ll nudge for an update. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2021, at 12:21 PM, Clebert Suconic < >>>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you have a Jenkins job already aligned to build it ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:19 PM Matt Pavlovich >>>>>>> <mattr...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I’m prepping the PR for 5.17.0. Please provide feedback on the >> JIRA. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any update on this? I've just seen that Victor Romero archived >>>>>>>>> his unofficial docker image. :( >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 4:57 PM Clebert Suconic < >>>>>>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm following up on that JIRA ticket. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:57 AM Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>>> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Matt, I thought you already had some information about >>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>> on Infra. I had misunderstood you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:33 AM Matt Pavlovich < >>>>> mattr...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Clebert- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I do not have all the info yet, INFRA has assigned the >>>>>>>>>>>> ticket but >>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>> started working on it =) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Matt >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2021, at 9:25 AM, Clebert Suconic < >>>>>>>>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I tried to follow the JIRA on Infra and I did not see much >>>>>>>>>> information about it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What's the procedure to upload images? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The only thing I saw was this JIRA: But it seemed you would >>>>>>>>>>>>> be uploading images manually? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21430 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't there an official way to provide the images? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In artemis we have a docker module where you would build >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>> binaries >>>>>>>>>>>>> and create the image. We would just need to add that to a >>> Jenkins >>>>>>>>>>>>> build and produce an image whenever a tag is created. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose ActiveMQ branch would do the same... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How this is supposed to work? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> thank you >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 4:13 PM Matt Pavlovich < >>>>> mattr...@gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The initial features list and notes in the JIRA reflect >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> approach. I’ll start on the module and push a PR this weekend. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2021, at 2:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre < >>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree, I think it’s the most convenient approach. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, at Karaf, I maintain a Dockerfile as part >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>> codebase: >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/karaf/tree/master/assemblies/docker >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/karaf/tree/master/assemblies/docker> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As part of a Karaf release, I’m pushing Karaf docker image. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, anyone can start from the Karaf Dockerfile to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create >>>>>>>>>> their own one (we also provide a goal on the >>>>>>>>>> karaf-maven-plugin to >>>>> do >>>>>>>> so). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think ActiveMQ (at least classic) should just provide a >>>>>>>>>> Dockerfile (or a set) and push "official" docker images. But >>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>> letting >>>>>>>>>> people to create their own. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 17 févr. 2021 à 19:51, Hossack, Etienne >>>>>>>>>> <ehoss...@amazon.com.INVALID> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following this discussion with interest, since I greatly >>> enjoy >>>>>>>>>> the portability and consistency that Docker provides. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have some questions about the Dockerfile linked above >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> might be best served in a code review, but a more holistic >>>>>>>>>> question >>>>> I >>>>>>>>>> wanted to ask: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does ActiveMQ need to publish the Dockerfile? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion, simply defining the image then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documenting its >>>>>>>>>> location (README, website) and how to use it would add value >>>>>>>>>> to >>> many >>>>>>>>>> consumers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That way: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Dockerfile code can live within the ActiveMQ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository >>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> be close to the code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Anyone who wishes to consume the dockerfile can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Apache 2.0 >>>>>>>>>> license) through their own build process >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The ActiveMQ community does not need to maintain any >>>>>> additional >>>>>>>>>> infrastructure, release process, repositories, dependencies. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * The Dockerfile can and should be independent of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular >>>>>>>>>> binaries < >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practic >>> es/#env >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> whenever possible, but even if not, this way each active >>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>> would >>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>> the source of truth for a functioning Dockerfile (can build >>>>>>>>>> and run >>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>> on the version), and no incremental versions would have to be >>>>>> published. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we could gain lots of value for little >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investment >>> this >>>>>>>>>> way. What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Étienne >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. should I add the questions on the JIRA ticket as well? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Étienne Hossack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Development Engineer, Amazon MQ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: ehoss...@amazon.com <mailto:ehoss...@amazon.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phone: +1-778-945-8287 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Clebert Suconic < >>>>>>>>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com <mailto:clebert.suco...@gmail.com>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the >>>>>> organization. >>>>>>>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>> sender >>>>>>>>>> and know the content is safe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice to do the same with Artemis... we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already >>>>> have >>>>>>>>>> scripts to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build the images as part of the build.. we just don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> builds yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:36 AM Jenkins, Rodney J >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Rod) < jenki...@nationwide.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quick introduction: My name is Rod. I work with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chuck. I >>>>> am >>>>>>>>>> stepping in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while he is out. I am the coworker who does the TomEE >>>>> images. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a question on the tarballs on >>>>>> https://archive.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> <https://archive.apache.org/> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repo1.maven.org <https://repo1.maven.org/>. I >>>>>> noticed >>>>>>>>>> that the images are not the same SHA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and not the same size. Is there a reason for that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, the Dockerfile is mostly complete, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16 >>> /jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile >>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq/blob/master/classic/5.16 >>> /jre11/openjdk-buster/Dockerfile >>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the only thing left was getting the maven >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> download >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> work as the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fallback to the other repos. I can still make that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work, >>>>> but >>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>> thought it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was strange to see a difference in the sizes of the >> files. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is what we are proposing. I am going to start on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> other options >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> later today. We would be happy for any feedback. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rod. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From: *"Shank, Charles R" <shan...@nationwide.com >>> <mailto: >>>>>>>>>> shan...@nationwide.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 8:49 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To: *Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto: >>>>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net>>, Matt Pavlovich < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mattr...@gmail.com <mailto:mattr...@gmail.com>>, " >>>>>>>>>> dev@activemq.apache.org <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>" < >>>>>>>>>> dev@activemq.apache.org <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc: *"Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jenki...@nationwide.com >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:jenki...@nationwide.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree we should make this its own issue and open up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> discussion to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ActiveMQ community >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, we are working on the following repository >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> provide generic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> images available to the ActiveMQ community. You can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follow >>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>> progress >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here: *https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq < >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq>>* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because the needs of the community are varied, we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recommend >>>>>>>>>> making >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple versions of ActiveMQ classic and Artemis. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>> repos >>>>>>>>>> also will be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created to include OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. We also >>>>>> recommend >>>>>>>>>> leaving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> room for other operating systems other than Debian and >>>>>> multiple >>>>>>>>>> versions of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDK within both OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given the number of options, we are not sure how we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>> go >>>>>>>>>> about using a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> module to maintain the dockerfiles, but would be open >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>> it. >>>>>>>>>> Once we get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our dockerimages complete, we can discuss how they are >>>>>>>>>> maintained going >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward. We will also investigate with the folks at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/docker-library < >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/docker-library> to see what is required to >>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> images listed as the official images. I have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coworker >>>>> that >>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for the TomEE official images and has some >>>>>> contacts >>>>>>>>>> there. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We would like to get the communities thoughts and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input on >>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> course of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> action. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chuck Shank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: cid:image001.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0 >>>>>>>>>> <cid:image001.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0>] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: cid:image002.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0 >>>>>>>>>> <cid:image002.gif@01D70449.0A4B26E0>] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>>> >>> >>> >>
