Yes, that's the issue, I mentioned it at least a few times in this thread and the previous one.
For reference, the test looks as follows: https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/blob/af9085dbea8dc467ede565dda9312610cc8b42b7/test/ArtemisNetClient.IntegrationTests/TopologyManagement/DeleteQueueSpec.cs#L53-L79 On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 3:29 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > I meant the Boolean property saying auto remove address. I didn’t realize > that was the issue. > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 9:27 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > I did not realize there was a management operation in the mix. I agree > > with Robbie > > > > @Havret let me know if that’s the issue please ? > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 6:05 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> If the management API has a queue deletion operation that takes an > >> 'auto delete address' boolean then I would consider it a bug if it > >> doesnt actually [eventually] delete a previously > >> auto-created-by-management address when that boolean is true, > >> regardless of the broker config. > >> > >> If it doesnt delete the address then it seems effectively useless; if > >> it only does anything if auto-delete-address was set true in the > >> broker config then why does the management boolean even exist at all? > >> It then seems to do nearly or absolutely nothing (unless setting the > >> management boolean false will somehow prevent the address being > >> auto-deleted by the broker even if its auto-delete config is set > >> true...seems unlikely)? > >> > >> Personally I think this is a bug and the explicit management boolean > >> should be respected, it and the broker auto deletion are not even > >> really the same form of auto-deletion. The general auto-deletion > >> mechanism is a sweep recognising unused auto-created things. The > >> management operation is an explicit command that 'im deleting the > >> queue, also auto delete its address now, the one that you auto-created > >> earlier, so that I dont have to go do that separately'. It is > >> essentially a shortcut to avoid needing to perform another management > >> operation. > >> > >> At the very least if it is to be considered not-a-bug it should throw > >> an exception when the value is true if it isnt actually going to work, > >> e.g an IllegalStateException, alerting the user to their folly of > >> expecting it to work in the obvious way it previously seems to have. > >> > >> In reverse, I would also expect/assume an 'auto create address' > >> management boolean on queue creation to work, even when the 'auto > >> create addresses' broker config is set false. If not, again it should > >> throw. > >> > >> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 06:39, Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > It seems I was assuming that calling destroy queue via management API > >> has > >> > greater precedence than configuration setting. With that being said I > >> will > >> > just update the client docs, so the API doesn't confuse users anymore. > >> > > >> > To summarize: > >> > If you create a queue with *auto-create-address *flag set to true, and > >> then > >> > try to destroy it, the flag *autoDeleteAddress *will work only, and > >> only if > >> > the broker configuration has *auto-delete-addresses* flag set to true. > >> > > >> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:31 AM Clebert Suconic < > >> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > If auto-delete is disabled, the address should not be removed. > >> > > > >> > > If you had a case where it was removed, it was a bug. > >> > > > >> > > The flag was respected before.. but perhaps there was a situation it > >> was > >> > > not. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > You telling me to disrespect the flag and always remove it.. would > be > >> > > an oxymoron.. I would just pretty much ignore the setting. > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:56 PM Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > This particular queue is not defined in broker.xml. I'm not sure > if > >> 2.19 > >> > > is > >> > > > semantically correct, as having the same configuration I'm getting > >> > > > different results than with 2.18 and previous versions. I > >> understand that > >> > > > removing the address was decoupled from removing the queue, but in > >> this > >> > > > particular case the address is never deleted. > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm gessing that changes related to > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3502, > >> > > auto-delete-addresses > >> > > > flag, and management API delete queue (with autoDeleteAddress set > to > >> > > true) > >> > > > don't play nice together. > >> > > > > >> > > > My expectation would be that the address will be eventually > deleted > >> even > >> > > > though the auto-delete-addresses flag is disabled in broker > >> > > configuration. > >> > > > This is an imperative API call, at least from the client > >> perspective. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 5:46 AM Clebert Suconic < > >> > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > I believe 2.19 is semantically correct to the configuration you > >> are > >> > > > > showing. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > We also had another change related to not delete queues defined > on > >> > > > > broker.xml. Perhaps that’s the problem ? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 9:38 AM Havret <h4v...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Clebert, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I had the same broker configuration for 2.18.0 and the test > >> passed > >> > > just > >> > > > > > fine, so I don't think that the matter of new defaults. The > >> queue is > >> > > > > > removed just fine ( > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/blob/6cee91547c18194330062a48c3b02c7c385457ff/test/ArtemisNetClient.IntegrationTests/TopologyManagement/DeleteQueueSpec.cs#L68 > >> > > > > > ), > >> > > > > > the problem is that the management api seems to ignore > >> > > autoDeleteAddress > >> > > > > > parameter and the second assertion fails ( > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/blob/6cee91547c18194330062a48c3b02c7c385457ff/test/ArtemisNetClient.IntegrationTests/TopologyManagement/DeleteQueueSpec.cs#L70 > >> > > > > > ) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > Havret > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 2:54 AM Clebert Suconic < > >> > > > > clebert.suco...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The answer for that is in your configuration: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > <auto-delete-queues>false</auto-delete-queues> > >> > > > > > > <auto-delete-addresses>false</auto-delete-addresses> > >> > > > > > > > <auto-delete-created-queues>false</auto-delete-created-queues> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > if you create a new broker configuration now, these > >> auto-deletes > >> > > are > >> > > > > > > turned off. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I did that because I have been recommending people in > >> production to > >> > > > > > > turn them off.. so I thought I should just turn'em off by > >> > > default... > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I couldn't change the default default, but I added these to > >> new > >> > > > > > > configurations... > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > if you need to test auto-delete, you need to set them true. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Notice that since 2.19 now these will perform a scan before > an > >> > > actual > >> > > > > > > delete would happen. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > This is because I had seen a production issue where a > >> consumer that > >> > > > > > > was up to date, disconnected (connection failure), the close > >> > > deleted > >> > > > > > > the queue immediately, while immediately it caused to > another > >> > > queue to > >> > > > > > > be created... in one cirtcunstance the queue was created but > >> not > >> > > the > >> > > > > > > address, creating a mess.. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I tried to fixing it properly without adding the delays, > but I > >> > > could > >> > > > > > > not come up with a scenario that would always work > perfectly.. > >> > > because > >> > > > > > > the client will query for the queue, and then issue a create > >> > > > > > > separately.. there's always an issue between the queue and > >> > > create... > >> > > > > > > so... the best is to not remove the queue immediately any > >> more... > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 4:33 PM Havret <hav...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I'm trying to update the test suite of ArtemisNetClient to > >> use > >> > > > > ActiveMQ > >> > > > > > > > Artemis 2.19.0, but one of the tests starts failing on > >> 2.19.0: > >> > > > > > > > Should_delete_queue_alongside_with_auto_created_address > --> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/pull/300/checks?check_run_id=3943848841 > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > The test creates a queue using the management api and then > >> > > removes it > >> > > > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > flag autoDeleteAddress set to true. The queue is removed > >> but the > >> > > > > > address > >> > > > > > > > isn't. I've looked over the release notes, but I didn't > spot > >> > > anything > >> > > > > > > that > >> > > > > > > > could indicate this change of behavior. Is this a > >> regression, or > >> > > was > >> > > > > > it a > >> > > > > > > > deliberate change? > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Robbie suggested that it might be related to > >> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3502 > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I tried to adjust the test: > >> > > > > > > > - I set *address-queue-scan-period* to 100 > >> > > > > > > > - I wait up to 5 seconds until the address is removed > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > But the test still is failing. My broker configuration is > as > >> > > follows: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/blob/fc256b2a3784447fa4feadea58b62f58d1fcabfd/test/artemis/broker.xml > >> > > > > > > > Is it possible that this new setting interferes with > >> > > > > > > > *auto-delete-addresses *set to *false*? > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > Havret > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > Clebert Suconic > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Clebert Suconic > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Clebert Suconic > >> > > > >> > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
