The REST service in ActiveMQ 5 is actively used, and should not be removed. If there are bugs or issues, please file a JIRA.
Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 12, 2022, at 3:58 PM, Tetreault, Lucas <tetlu...@amazon.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > Should we remove REST from ActiveMQ "Classic" as well? I think the same > arguments apply about it being abandonware, etc. > > We could deprecate it in the upcoming 5.18.0 release and use this as > incentive to cut a 6.0.0 release? __ That would be exciting! > > - Lucas > > On 2022-09-12, 7:41 AM, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > I will go ahead and remove it... > > > I will also bump upstream/main as 3.0 as part of the removal. > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:24 PM Clebert Suconic > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I didn’t meant to imply I was going to remove it now >> >> I intend to do it on Monday. If no objection. >> >> >> Although keeping it means we would have to fix it. I honestly don’t see >> many options to keep it. >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:09 PM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> While I'm fine with it going I'd maybe give other folks more of chance >>> to reply...or at least use lay concensus style 'ill do it at <date> if >>> noone objects' :) >>> >>> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 17:48, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I will go ahead and remove it... >>>> >>>> >>>> to be honest I don't believe much in rest from JMS due to the session >>>> and stateful nature. >>>> >>>> >>>> But if we were to provide REST for our users, I would rather bring the >>>> servlet from AMQ5. it would be a major task anyway... and this >>>> module has to go for sure. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 10:20 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It has looked to be rotting for a long time, and requires various user >>>>> hoop jumping I dont expect many/any folks are interested in doing....I >>>>> think removing it makes sense. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 14:54, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not sure if there's much to discuss here. Rest in Artemis has been >>>>>> abandonware for a while (like 5 years)... The jboss-rest interface is >>>>>> a few major releases behind, the module compiles but it's not >>>>>> functional, and any time someone ask questions we just mention don't >>>>>> use it... (favoring stomp instead). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/main/artemis-rest >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As part of new logging changes, we are moving activemq-artemis into >>>>>> 3.0... >>>>>> >>>>>> At this point I see no other choice than remove the module. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any objections? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Clebert Suconic >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >> >> -- >> Clebert Suconic > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
