*if* we keep the javadoc, I would like to only keep the latest version.... I don't see much point on keeping 24+ versions of the javadocs
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 2:12 PM Étienne Hossack <activ...@hossack.me> wrote: > > -1 > > Reasons to keep: > * It's useful to be able to link a specific line/method in the javadoc when > explaining something to someone through the use of a URL > * It's nice to be able to navigate the source code in your browser, if say > your IDE is having issues and you can't correctly navigate to docs via sources > * Often times you can read the ActiveMQ Artemis docs and think you understand > a concept, but figuring out how to actually write the code to do it is pretty > different - especially when the docs go out of date. > > In fact I'd rather the docs continue to reference the source code even more. > > If it's a lot of effort to maintain the publishing, I would reconsider for > sure my stance, but as it stands, think it's pretty useful, and when my org > isn't rate-limited on the apache website, I use them :'-) > > -- > Étienne > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, at 9:12 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > Can we stop publishing javadocs on the ActiveMQ Website for artemis? > > > > I see no point on publishing it as they are available in Maven. > > > > My vote is to completely remove it. > > > > > > So, if you agree with me, please respond with > > > > +1 Yes, stop publishing javadocs for ActiveMQ Artemis on the website > > and keep them on maven as usual. > > > > > > > > if you have any other preferences please state a -1 and a reason for.. > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic
