That would also be nicer than having them all, though still the same amount of work on updates. Its what the 5.x docs at least aim to do (typically out of date).
Another middle ground might be just automating the release details linking to the zips on maven-central, meaning its still/actually referenced from the site for those that look, but doesnt take any specific effort/space/build-time etc. On Wed, 28 Sept 2022 at 20:06, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > *if* we keep the javadoc, I would like to only keep the latest > version.... I don't see much point on keeping 24+ versions of the > javadocs > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 2:12 PM Étienne Hossack <activ...@hossack.me> wrote: > > > > -1 > > > > Reasons to keep: > > * It's useful to be able to link a specific line/method in the javadoc when > > explaining something to someone through the use of a URL > > * It's nice to be able to navigate the source code in your browser, if say > > your IDE is having issues and you can't correctly navigate to docs via > > sources > > * Often times you can read the ActiveMQ Artemis docs and think you > > understand a concept, but figuring out how to actually write the code to do > > it is pretty different - especially when the docs go out of date. > > > > In fact I'd rather the docs continue to reference the source code even more. > > > > If it's a lot of effort to maintain the publishing, I would reconsider for > > sure my stance, but as it stands, think it's pretty useful, and when my org > > isn't rate-limited on the apache website, I use them :'-) > > > > -- > > Étienne > > > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, at 9:12 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > > Can we stop publishing javadocs on the ActiveMQ Website for artemis? > > > > > > I see no point on publishing it as they are available in Maven. > > > > > > My vote is to completely remove it. > > > > > > > > > So, if you agree with me, please respond with > > > > > > +1 Yes, stop publishing javadocs for ActiveMQ Artemis on the website > > > and keep them on maven as usual. > > > > > > > > > > > > if you have any other preferences please state a -1 and a reason for.. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic
