JB, are your thoughts on this more general, i.e also applying to the 5.x 'latest' (typically stale) javadocs on the website as well, rather than just the per-release Artemis javadocs this thread started about?
If so it would seem to me that all the people who regularly update the website bits for releases etc dont think we should bother having them there anymore. On Thu, 29 Sept 2022 at 20:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > Hi Clebert, > > I'm +1 about this for the two reasons: > > 1. I don't think lot of people read the Javadoc on website (personally > I'm reading directly in the IDE) > 2. We can still have the javadoc jar published on Maven (not need to > update website) > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:12 PM Clebert Suconic > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Can we stop publishing javadocs on the ActiveMQ Website for artemis? > > > > I see no point on publishing it as they are available in Maven. > > > > My vote is to completely remove it. > > > > > > So, if you agree with me, please respond with > > > > +1 Yes, stop publishing javadocs for ActiveMQ Artemis on the website > > and keep them on maven as usual. > > > > > > > > if you have any other preferences please state a -1 and a reason for.. > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic
