I hope to present it later this week. Thanks for your patience!
Justin On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 6:16 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Justin- > > Sure, when do you plan to share your research? > > Thanks, > Matt > > > On Mar 15, 2024, at 10:22 AM, Justin Bertram <jbert...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > -1 > > > > I don't think there's been sufficient discussion of the pros and cons to > > make an informed decision. I've done some investigation and testing and > I'd > > like a chance to present my findings. This would be a fairly significant > > change, and I think it deserves a more detailed review than we've had so > > far. > > > > Also, I think migration should be considered for ActiveMQ as a whole and > > not just a single component (i.e. Classic). Having multiple different > ways > > to complete the same task in the same project isn't going to be great for > > users or contributors. If the change is good for one component then it > > stands to reason that it would be good for all. > > > > > > Justin > > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 10:06 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> All- > >> > >> Kicking off a vote thread for migrating ActiveMQ Classic issues from > JIRA > >> to GitHub. > >> > >> This vote covers: > >> - Migration of ActiveMQ Classic JIRA issues to GitHub > >> - Update Apache ActiveMQ website with links to GitHub issues > >> > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Matt Pavlovich > >> > >> > >
