Hey Justin- Checking in.. have you had a chance to collect your findings?
Thanks, Matt > On Mar 18, 2024, at 3:26 PM, Justin Bertram <jbert...@apache.org> wrote: > > I hope to present it later this week. Thanks for your patience! > > > Justin > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 6:16 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Justin- >> >> Sure, when do you plan to share your research? >> >> Thanks, >> Matt >> >>> On Mar 15, 2024, at 10:22 AM, Justin Bertram <jbert...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> -1 >>> >>> I don't think there's been sufficient discussion of the pros and cons to >>> make an informed decision. I've done some investigation and testing and >> I'd >>> like a chance to present my findings. This would be a fairly significant >>> change, and I think it deserves a more detailed review than we've had so >>> far. >>> >>> Also, I think migration should be considered for ActiveMQ as a whole and >>> not just a single component (i.e. Classic). Having multiple different >> ways >>> to complete the same task in the same project isn't going to be great for >>> users or contributors. If the change is good for one component then it >>> stands to reason that it would be good for all. >>> >>> >>> Justin >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 10:06 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> All- >>>> >>>> Kicking off a vote thread for migrating ActiveMQ Classic issues from >> JIRA >>>> to GitHub. >>>> >>>> This vote covers: >>>> - Migration of ActiveMQ Classic JIRA issues to GitHub >>>> - Update Apache ActiveMQ website with links to GitHub issues >>>> >>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Matt Pavlovich >>>> >>>> >> >>
