Ouch... this was intended to their list... at least I accidentally spoiled what I'm going to write in there :)
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 5:42 PM Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > > so, I spoke to folds on our slack channel for ActiveMQ. > > We use for our testsute, and never in production... We can easily > replace it by either dockerized databases (e.g Mysql or Oracle), or > use HSQL / H2. > > We would be happy to use it if there's still a community around it, > but if there's not enough community (devs) to keep the project going, > we coudln't find anyone at ActiveMQ willing to maintain it. > > > We will just watch this space and decide based on the outcome here. > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 5:39 PM Clebert Suconic > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > from what I spoke to folks on slack channel, Derby is not really > > mission critical for us. We could replace by HSQLDB / H2, or just use > > a dockerized database. > > > > > > For Artemis this is exactly what I'm planning to do.. use real databases. > > > > > > I will say on the Derby community that we could replace it by > > something else if the project goes away. > > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 3:03 PM Clebert Suconic > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I saw a discussion today about Derby retiring... > > > > > > We still use it as part of our testsuites, both on ActiveMQ "Classic" > > > and "Artemis"... > > > > > > > > > I wonder what should we do about this? Should we let it retire, should > > > we still use it as read-only (as its a good tool for testing), or > > > should we ask them to keep it alive? > > > > > > > > > If we let it retire, what would we replace it with? > > > > > > -- > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
