Hi Felix, I just want to mention some points.
1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names is fixed now. 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source distribution. 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it is included. 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have to go by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks so I am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. Please advise. We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. Best regards, On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > ________________________________ > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and > >ask everyone to vote? > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > > just the mentor. > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > >I will remove this file. > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure it > >is consistent. > > > > 3. > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > 4. > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there a > > possible licensing issue? > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache License > >as well which is included in the licensing file. > > 5, > > KEYS.txt > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git > > repo > > I will remove this as well. > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or > >thoughts. > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the > > following link: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > Best regards, > > Eya > > >
