Hi Felix, John and I were friends before working together, so we are used to discussing things privately; also we have a Google Hangouts forum we use when we wanna talk to each other. When our project was donated to Apache we decided to move all necessary communication to the Slack channel you are included in. In retrospect, all we post there are patches that John and I have already deemed necessary to the project. John and I have discussed this and will endeavour to move our discussion to the Apache AGE mailing lists. Thank you for understanding and sorry for the trouble.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:13 PM Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> wrote: > Please disregard the previous message. I just replaced it with "the Apache > Incubator PMC." > > On 2021/01/21 23:29:50, Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hello @ Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> and all, > > > > Regarding the WIP-Disclaimer, could you please advise what to include > when it mentioned "the name of Apache TLP sponsor". I am not sure about > this part. > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > "Apache AGE is an effort undergoing incubation at The Apache Software > Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache TLP sponsor. " > > > > > > On 2021/01/19 05:58:03, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the updates. > > > > > > For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is > off (for example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache > license and normally will not be possible to release with) it is just > easier to get through the process. The community can decide if you want to > go this route or not. > > > > > > For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be > best not to include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is > best not to include files, source code etc from another project because > then proper attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE > file) > > > > > > See bundled dependencies here > https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > > > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM > > > To: dev@age.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > Hi Felix, > > > > > > I just want to mention some points. > > > > > > 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different > names is fixed now. > > > 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source > distribution. > > > 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and > it is included. > > > 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: > > > We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we > have to go by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? > > > > > > All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending > tasks so I am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress > disclaimer. Please advise. > > > > > > We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and > content. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > > > > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > > > > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > > > > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev > list and ask everyone to vote? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it > shouldn’t be just the mentor. > > > > > > > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > > > > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > > > > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > > > > >I will remove this file. > > > > > > > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > > > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > > > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > > > > > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make > sure it is consistent. > > > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > > > > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > > > > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > > > > > > > 4. > > > > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > > > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is > there a possible licensing issue? > > > > > > > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache > License as well which is included in the licensing file. > > > > > 5, > > > > > KEYS.txt > > > > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be > in git repo > > > > > I will remove this as well. > > > > > > > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions > or thoughts. > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > > > > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > > > > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > > > > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on > the following link: > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > > > > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Eya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
