+1 binding

Max

On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:23 PM Jiajie Zhong <zhongjiajie...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 non binding
>
> Best wish.
> -- Jiajie
> ________________________________
> From: Chao-Han Tsai <milton0...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 0:45
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-10: Multi-layered and multi-stage official Airflow
> image
>
> +1 non binding
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 2:21 AM Kamil Breguła <kamil.breg...@polidea.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 2:34 PM Flo Rance <troura...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:19 PM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Airflow community,
> > > >
> > > > This email calls for a vote to accept Airflow Improvement Proposal
> 10:
> > > > Multi-layered and multi-stage official Airflow image.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will last for at least 1 week until Midnight Friday 12th of
> > > April,
> > > > and at least three +1 (binding) votes have been cast.
> > > >
> > > > Current official Airflow image is rebuilt from the scratch every time
> > > when
> > > > a new commit is done to the repo. It is a "mono-layered" one and does
> > not
> > > > use Docker's multi-layer architecture nor multi-stage Docker
> > > architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Mono-layered image means that builds after only small changes take as
> > > long
> > > > as full build rather than utilize caching and only rebuild what's
> > needed.
> > > >
> > > > This change will make development on Airflow faster, and simplify the
> > > whole
> > > > CI process. We can both use the multi-layered image both for CI and
> > > > development.
> > > >
> > > > For a detailed explanation and discussing the proposal in depth,
> please
> > > > refer to the Wiki to keep all the communication in a single place:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-10+Multi-layered+and+multi-stage+official+Airflow+image
> > > >
> > > > This is my +1 (binding) vote.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Fokko
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Chao-Han Tsai
>

Reply via email to