+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:51 PM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:50 PM Bas Harenslak < > basharens...@godatadriven.com> wrote: > > > Hello Airflow community, > > > > This email calls for a vote to introduce Pylint in the Airflow project. > > The vote will last for at least 1 week (April 18th 23:00 CET), and at > least > > three +1 (binding) votes have been cast. > > > > After feedback on AIP-6 and discussion on Slack< > > https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/CCPRP7943/p1554962392081400>, > I > > propose to vote for adding Pylint<https://pylint.org> to the Airflow > > project for static code checking. Pylint complements Flake8 with stricter > > rules, detects code smells and is customisable so unnecessary checks can > be > > ignored. This should benefit the Airflow code base with consistent, > > documented code and less errors. > > > > Note that Pylint 2.0 works with Python 3 only, so if the vote is > > successful, it should be introduced after dropping support for Python 2 > > (AIRFLOW-4196<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4196>). > > Note2: to keep the scope as small as possible, I’ll create a separate > vote > > for Black formatting. > > > > Cheers, > > Bas > > > > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > E: jarek.pot...@polidea.com > -- *Kaxil Naik* *Big Data Consultant *@ *Data Reply UK* *Certified *Google Cloud Data Engineer | *Certified* Apache Spark & Neo4j Developer *LinkedIn*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kaxil
