>
> Maybe there is solid reasoning behind this change; if so, that reasoning
> would be welcome.

Oh this info is in the referenced pdf 🤦‍♂️

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:51 PM Daniel Standish <dpstand...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It would probably be prudent to review how it looks in different
> situations, e.g. as a favicon on chrome, and as a small icon in airflow
> home page.
>
> Perhaps Chris could provide?
>
> Additionally I am sympathetic to James's concerns (which somehow ended up
> in a different thread).  I like the solid colors but I do prefer the old
> geometry, which is more consistent with pinwheels you see in the wild.
> Maybe there is solid reasoning behind this change; if so, that reasoning
> would be welcome.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:24 PM Ben Tallman <btall...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Looks great!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Philippe Gagnon <philgagn...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 5:19 PM
>> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tweaks to the Airflow logo
>>
>> +1 I like it as well.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 17:06 Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
>> <aizha...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > I like it too! @Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> - will be nice to
>> add
>> > the new one here
>> >
>> https://www.redbubble.com/people/comdev/works/40497530-apache-airflow?asc=u
>> > for
>> > future swags!
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:32 PM Kevin Yang <yrql...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Lol totally a shuriken, coool~
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:22 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Of course, vector versions will be available.
>> > > >
>> > > > We'll give everyone a bit more time for feedback and opinions (a
>> day or
>> > > > two?), possibly do a revision then open up a formal vote.
>> > > >
>> > > > On 13 August 2019 20:19:09 BST, Maxime Beauchemin <
>> > > > maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >+1! (as the "designer" of the original) :) Please make sure to
>> share
>> > > > >the
>> > > > >vector files in the repo as well
>> > > > >
>> > > > >Also don't forget to upload here https://www.apache.org/logos/
>> > > > >
>> > > > >On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:12 PM Felix Uellendall
>> > > > ><felix.uellend...@protonmail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> +1 looks so much cleaner and more modern :)
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Felix
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Am 13/08/2019 um 16:29 schrieb Nathan Maynes:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > I like the change from gradients to flat. It makes it less busy
>> > and
>> > > > >is
>> > > > >> especially helpful for small sizes.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:28 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <
>> a...@apache.org
>> > >
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >> Hi everyone,
>> > > > >> >>
>> > > > >> >> Here at Astronomer we've just had our Lead Designer, Chris
>> > > > >Hendrixson,
>> > > > >> join us recently and he's proposed a few subtle tweaks to the
>> > Airflow
>> > > > >logo
>> > > > >> that I think keep it still recognisably the same logo, but just a
>> > bit
>> > > > >more
>> > > > >> refined.
>> > > > >> >>
>> > > > >> >> In his words:
>> > > > >> >>
>> > > > >> >>> The new Airflow icon was designed by me, Chris Hendrixson.
>> I’m
>> > > > >the
>> > > > >> Lead Designer at Astronomer. I’ve been designing logos and
>> > interfaces
>> > > > >and
>> > > > >> many other things for over a decade. This rebrand is free, of
>> > course.
>> > > > >I’m
>> > > > >> excited about contributing to the open source community.
>> > > > >> >>
>> > > > >> >> I don't think the mailing list allows attachments, so you can
>> > view
>> > > > >it
>> > > > >> on the wiki <
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Proposed+Logo+Redesign
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >>
>> > > > >> >> What do people think of this?
>> > > > >> >>
>> > > > >> >> -ash
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > --
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > [Nathan Maynes](http://bit.ly/115hXAt)
>> > > > >> > @nathanmaynes
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to