Hi all,

This thread got split somehow. To bring discussion of Daniel's proposal to
this thread:

Daniel Gruno <[email protected]>
Wed, Aug 14, 2:33 AM (1 day ago)
to dev

Hi James,
I don't mean to butt in much here, but as the general "guy who fixes
various logos around here" (I re-did the current airflow logo as the other
version had bad color tearing and splotches of...I dunno what), what about
perhaps taking the best of both worlds and compromising? Using the more
simple design of the suggested logo in this thread, but making it more
realistic, adding the 'button' back in, adding a bit of thickness to the
wings.

I made a quick mock-up of the current, proposed, and an example compromise
version at: https://imgur.com/a/G0Bpcky


---

Personally I like "Alternate 2" much more. It is somewhat simplified but
not so flattened that it stops looking like a pinwheel; and it's much less
like a "shuriken" with fewer points.

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 2:34 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> There's a bit of reasoning behind the changes in the PDF on the wiki.
>
> On 14 August 2019 07:00:13 BST, Shah Altaf <[email protected]> wrote:
> >That's a good point, often these things have to be seen in context.
> >I've just tried it out myself in a browser as a favicon + top-left
> >logo.
> >
> >Screenshots:
> >New icon:  https://i.imgur.com/8VvQwr8.png
> >Original:  https://i.imgur.com/WRuJTUW.png
> >
> >The new logo looks good with the flatness, but also feels 'sharper' on
> >the
> >eyes (as a shuriken would)
> >The colors work well against the header background.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:52 AM Daniel Standish <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> It would probably be prudent to review how it looks in different
> >> situations, e.g. as a favicon on chrome, and as a small icon in
> >airflow
> >> home page.
> >>
> >> Perhaps Chris could provide?
> >>
> >> Additionally I am sympathetic to James's concerns (which somehow
> >ended up
> >> in a different thread).  I like the solid colors but I do prefer the
> >old
> >> geometry, which is more consistent with pinwheels you see in the
> >wild.
> >> Maybe there is solid reasoning behind this change; if so, that
> >reasoning
> >> would be welcome.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:24 PM Ben Tallman <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Looks great!
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Ben
> >> >
> >> > ________________________________
> >> > From: Philippe Gagnon <[email protected]>
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 5:19 PM
> >> > To: [email protected]
> >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tweaks to the Airflow logo
> >> >
> >> > +1 I like it as well.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 17:06 Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I like it too! @Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> - will be nice
> >to
> >> add
> >> > > the new one here
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> https://www.redbubble.com/people/comdev/works/40497530-apache-airflow?asc=u
> >> > > for
> >> > > future swags!
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:32 PM Kevin Yang <[email protected]>
> >wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Lol totally a shuriken, coool~
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:22 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor
> ><[email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Of course, vector versions will be available.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > We'll give everyone a bit more time for feedback and opinions
> >(a
> >> day
> >> > or
> >> > > > > two?), possibly do a revision then open up a formal vote.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 13 August 2019 20:19:09 BST, Maxime Beauchemin <
> >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > >+1! (as the "designer" of the original) :) Please make sure
> >to
> >> share
> >> > > > > >the
> >> > > > > >vector files in the repo as well
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >Also don't forget to upload here
> >https://www.apache.org/logos/
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:12 PM Felix Uellendall
> >> > > > > ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >> +1 looks so much cleaner and more modern :)
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> Felix
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> Am 13/08/2019 um 16:29 schrieb Nathan Maynes:
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >> > I like the change from gradients to flat. It makes it
> >less
> >> busy
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > >is
> >> > > > > >> especially helpful for small sizes.
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:28 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > >> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >> Hi everyone,
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> Here at Astronomer we've just had our Lead Designer,
> >Chris
> >> > > > > >Hendrixson,
> >> > > > > >> join us recently and he's proposed a few subtle tweaks to
> >the
> >> > > Airflow
> >> > > > > >logo
> >> > > > > >> that I think keep it still recognisably the same logo, but
> >just
> >> a
> >> > > bit
> >> > > > > >more
> >> > > > > >> refined.
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> In his words:
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >>> The new Airflow icon was designed by me, Chris
> >Hendrixson.
> >> I’m
> >> > > > > >the
> >> > > > > >> Lead Designer at Astronomer. I’ve been designing logos and
> >> > > interfaces
> >> > > > > >and
> >> > > > > >> many other things for over a decade. This rebrand is free,
> >of
> >> > > course.
> >> > > > > >I’m
> >> > > > > >> excited about contributing to the open source community.
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> I don't think the mailing list allows attachments, so
> >you can
> >> > > view
> >> > > > > >it
> >> > > > > >> on the wiki <
> >> > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Proposed+Logo+Redesign
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> What do people think of this?
> >> > > > > >> >>
> >> > > > > >> >> -ash
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> > --
> >> > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > >> > [Nathan Maynes](http://bit.ly/115hXAt)
> >> > > > > >> > @nathanmaynes
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to