Hi all, This thread got split somehow. To bring discussion of Daniel's proposal to this thread:
Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> Wed, Aug 14, 2:33 AM (1 day ago) to dev Hi James, I don't mean to butt in much here, but as the general "guy who fixes various logos around here" (I re-did the current airflow logo as the other version had bad color tearing and splotches of...I dunno what), what about perhaps taking the best of both worlds and compromising? Using the more simple design of the suggested logo in this thread, but making it more realistic, adding the 'button' back in, adding a bit of thickness to the wings. I made a quick mock-up of the current, proposed, and an example compromise version at: https://imgur.com/a/G0Bpcky --- Personally I like "Alternate 2" much more. It is somewhat simplified but not so flattened that it stops looking like a pinwheel; and it's much less like a "shuriken" with fewer points. On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 2:34 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > There's a bit of reasoning behind the changes in the PDF on the wiki. > > On 14 August 2019 07:00:13 BST, Shah Altaf <mend...@gmail.com> wrote: > >That's a good point, often these things have to be seen in context. > >I've just tried it out myself in a browser as a favicon + top-left > >logo. > > > >Screenshots: > >New icon: https://i.imgur.com/8VvQwr8.png > >Original: https://i.imgur.com/WRuJTUW.png > > > >The new logo looks good with the flatness, but also feels 'sharper' on > >the > >eyes (as a shuriken would) > >The colors work well against the header background. > > > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:52 AM Daniel Standish <dpstand...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >> It would probably be prudent to review how it looks in different > >> situations, e.g. as a favicon on chrome, and as a small icon in > >airflow > >> home page. > >> > >> Perhaps Chris could provide? > >> > >> Additionally I am sympathetic to James's concerns (which somehow > >ended up > >> in a different thread). I like the solid colors but I do prefer the > >old > >> geometry, which is more consistent with pinwheels you see in the > >wild. > >> Maybe there is solid reasoning behind this change; if so, that > >reasoning > >> would be welcome. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:24 PM Ben Tallman <btall...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > >> > >> > Looks great! > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Ben > >> > > >> > ________________________________ > >> > From: Philippe Gagnon <philgagn...@gmail.com> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 5:19 PM > >> > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tweaks to the Airflow logo > >> > > >> > +1 I like it as well. > >> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 17:06 Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy > >> > <aizha...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > > >> > > I like it too! @Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> - will be nice > >to > >> add > >> > > the new one here > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > https://www.redbubble.com/people/comdev/works/40497530-apache-airflow?asc=u > >> > > for > >> > > future swags! > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 1:32 PM Kevin Yang <yrql...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Lol totally a shuriken, coool~ > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:22 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor > ><a...@apache.org> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Of course, vector versions will be available. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > We'll give everyone a bit more time for feedback and opinions > >(a > >> day > >> > or > >> > > > > two?), possibly do a revision then open up a formal vote. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On 13 August 2019 20:19:09 BST, Maxime Beauchemin < > >> > > > > maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >+1! (as the "designer" of the original) :) Please make sure > >to > >> share > >> > > > > >the > >> > > > > >vector files in the repo as well > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >Also don't forget to upload here > >https://www.apache.org/logos/ > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:12 PM Felix Uellendall > >> > > > > ><felix.uellend...@protonmail.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 looks so much cleaner and more modern :) > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> Felix > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> Am 13/08/2019 um 16:29 schrieb Nathan Maynes: > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > I like the change from gradients to flat. It makes it > >less > >> busy > >> > > and > >> > > > > >is > >> > > > > >> especially helpful for small sizes. > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:28 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor < > >> > a...@apache.org > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> Hi everyone, > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> Here at Astronomer we've just had our Lead Designer, > >Chris > >> > > > > >Hendrixson, > >> > > > > >> join us recently and he's proposed a few subtle tweaks to > >the > >> > > Airflow > >> > > > > >logo > >> > > > > >> that I think keep it still recognisably the same logo, but > >just > >> a > >> > > bit > >> > > > > >more > >> > > > > >> refined. > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> In his words: > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> The new Airflow icon was designed by me, Chris > >Hendrixson. > >> I’m > >> > > > > >the > >> > > > > >> Lead Designer at Astronomer. I’ve been designing logos and > >> > > interfaces > >> > > > > >and > >> > > > > >> many other things for over a decade. This rebrand is free, > >of > >> > > course. > >> > > > > >I’m > >> > > > > >> excited about contributing to the open source community. > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> I don't think the mailing list allows attachments, so > >you can > >> > > view > >> > > > > >it > >> > > > > >> on the wiki < > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Proposed+Logo+Redesign > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> What do people think of this? > >> > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > >> >> -ash > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > -- > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > [Nathan Maynes](http://bit.ly/115hXAt) > >> > > > > >> > @nathanmaynes > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
