+1 from me for sure. Thanks for pushing this through Aizhamal. GCP just named their flink operator ( https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/flink-on-k8s-operator ) *flink-on-k8s-operator.*
So for name, I prefer either *k8s-operator-for-airflow* or *airflow-on-k8s-operator*. I sort of like the latter better because *airflow* is the first word rather than the last. -Ry czw., 12 wrz 2019, 16:17 użytkownik Jarek Potiuk < Jarek. Potiuk@ polidea. com ( jarek.pot...@polidea.com ) > napisał: > > > > Fantastic! Strong +1 from me. > > > > > To alleviate some of the concerns - we @Polidea are just starting a > project for big and serious customer where we will most likely use and > extend Kubernetes Operator. > > > > > We have 3 people that could become contributors and commiters day one, so > we can already help building community for it. Looking forward to > following the Apache way in this case ! > > > > > J. > > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:23 AM Tao Feng < fengtao04@ gmail. com ( > fengta...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> +1 as well. One question: does the original author still actively maintain >> or would like to continue maintaining the code base after the repo is >> moved >> >> to Airflow? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:10 PM Sumit Maheshwari < sumeet. manit@ gmail. com >> ( sumeet.ma...@gmail.com ) >> >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Strong +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < aizhamal@ apache. >>> org ( aizha...@apache.org ) > >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello Airflow community, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Over the last year, an engineer at Google developed, and open sourced >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> a >> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Kubernetes operator to run Airflow[1]. Anyone can use it to deploy >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Airflow >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> on their k8s cluster freely. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> There have been discussions among community members that it would be >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> great >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> to donate the operator to Apache to be part of Airflow. That way it is >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> easy >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> to accept contributions from the community, improve and maintain it >>>> collectively and transparently, along with the Airflow-k8s >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> integration. >> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This idea has been discussed at Google, and we have obtained all >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> necessary >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> approvals to donate the operator. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This discussion is to gather opinions from the community whether you >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> all >> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> think that it is a good idea. I personally think that this would be a >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> great >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> addition to Airflow. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please express your thoughts or concerns if you have any. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The discussion will run for 72 hours, and if there is consensus on >>>> accepting the donation, we will move the code under the Apache >>>> organization, to be owned by the Airflow community. If consensus is >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> not >> >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> evident, we can have a vote after this discussion. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Aizhamal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > Sent via Superhuman ( https://sprh.mn/?vip=r...@rywalker.com ) On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:19 AM, Jarek Potiuk < jarek.pot...@polidea.com > wrote: > > > > The name is indeed misleading. My proposal would be > k8s-operator-for-airflow - this might make it unambiguous . > > > > czw., 12 wrz 2019, 16:17 użytkownik Jarek Potiuk < Jarek. Potiuk@ polidea. > com ( jarek.pot...@polidea.com ) > napisał: > > >> >> >> Fantastic! Strong +1 from me. >> >> >> >> To alleviate some of the concerns - we @Polidea are just starting a >> project for big and serious customer where we will most likely use and >> extend Kubernetes Operator. >> >> >> >> We have 3 people that could become contributors and commiters day one, so >> we can already help building community for it. Looking forward to >> following the Apache way in this case ! >> >> >> >> J. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:23 AM Tao Feng < fengtao04@ gmail. com ( >> fengta...@gmail.com ) > wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >>> +1 as well. One question: does the original author still actively maintain >>> or would like to continue maintaining the code base after the repo is >>> moved >>> to Airflow? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:10 PM Sumit Maheshwari < sumeet. manit@ gmail. >>> com >>> ( sumeet.ma...@gmail.com ) >>> >>> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Strong +1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < aizhamal@ apache. >>>> org ( aizha...@apache.org ) > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hello Airflow community, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Over the last year, an engineer at Google developed, and open sourced >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> a >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kubernetes operator to run Airflow[1]. Anyone can use it to deploy >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Airflow >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> on their k8s cluster freely. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There have been discussions among community members that it would be >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> great >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> to donate the operator to Apache to be part of Airflow. That way it is >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> easy >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> to accept contributions from the community, improve and maintain it >>>>> collectively and transparently, along with the Airflow-k8s >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> integration. >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This idea has been discussed at Google, and we have obtained all >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> necessary >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> approvals to donate the operator. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This discussion is to gather opinions from the community whether you >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> all >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> think that it is a good idea. I personally think that this would be a >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> great >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> addition to Airflow. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please express your thoughts or concerns if you have any. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The discussion will run for 72 hours, and if there is consensus on >>>>> accepting the donation, we will move the code under the Apache >>>>> organization, to be owned by the Airflow community. If consensus is >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> not >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> evident, we can have a vote after this discussion. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Aizhamal >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] https:/ / github. com/ GoogleCloudPlatform/ airflow-operator ( >>>>> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/airflow-operator ) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
