+1 here!

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:20 AM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com>
wrote:

> The name is indeed misleading. My proposal would be
> k8s-operator-for-airflow - this might make it unambiguous .
>
> czw., 12 wrz 2019, 16:17 użytkownik Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com
> >
> napisał:
>
> > Fantastic! Strong +1 from me.
> >
> > To alleviate some of the concerns - we @Polidea are just starting a
> > project for big and serious customer where we will most likely use and
> > extend Kubernetes Operator.
> >
> > We have 3 people that could become contributors and commiters day one, so
> > we can already help building community for it. Looking forward to
> following
> > the Apache way in this case !
> >
> > J.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:23 AM Tao Feng <fengta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 as well. One question: does the original author still actively
> maintain
> >> or would like to continue maintaining the code base after the repo is
> >> moved
> >> to Airflow?
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:10 PM Sumit Maheshwari <
> sumeet.ma...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Strong +1
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
> >> > aizha...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hello Airflow community,
> >> > >
> >> > > Over the last year, an engineer at Google developed, and open
> sourced
> >> a
> >> > > Kubernetes operator to run Airflow[1]. Anyone can use it to deploy
> >> > Airflow
> >> > > on their k8s cluster freely.
> >> > >
> >> > > There have been discussions among community members that it would be
> >> > great
> >> > > to donate the operator to Apache to be part of Airflow. That way it
> is
> >> > easy
> >> > > to accept contributions from the community, improve and maintain it
> >> > > collectively and transparently, along with the Airflow-k8s
> >> integration.
> >> > >
> >> > > This idea has been discussed at Google, and we have obtained all
> >> > necessary
> >> > > approvals to donate the operator.
> >> > >
> >> > > This discussion is to gather opinions from the community whether you
> >> all
> >> > > think that it is a good idea. I personally think that this would be
> a
> >> > great
> >> > > addition to Airflow.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please express your thoughts or concerns if you have any.
> >> > >
> >> > > The discussion will run for 72 hours, and if there is consensus on
> >> > > accepting the donation, we will move the code under the Apache
> >> > > organization, to be owned by the Airflow community. If consensus is
> >> not
> >> > > evident, we can have a vote after this discussion.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Aizhamal
> >> > >
> >> > > [1] https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/airflow-operator
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to