Thanks everyone for participating in the discussion! I see there is a consensus among the community on this regard, therefore we will move forward with the process.
Next step is to get IP clearance as described here [1]. This step is done by the receiving PMC, and @Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> has agreed to help. Thank you! I am closing this thread now, and Jakob will start a new one when it is time to vote. Thanks everyone, Aizhamal [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:41 PM Kamil Breguła <kamil.breg...@polidea.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:40 PM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 for aieflow-on-k8s-operator. Good enough :) > > > > J. > > > > pt., 13 wrz 2019, 19:19 użytkownik Tao Feng <fengta...@gmail.com> > napisał: > > > > > +1 on `airflow-on-k8s-operator` as well > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:07 AM Ry Walker <r...@rywalker.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 from me for sure. Thanks for pushing this through Aizhamal. > > > > > > > > GCP just named their flink operator ( > > > > https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/flink-on-k8s-operator > > > > ) *flink-on-k8s-operator.* > > > > > > > > So for name, I prefer either *k8s-operator-for-airflow* or > > > > *airflow-on-k8s-operator*. I sort of like the latter better because > > > > *airflow* is the first word rather than the last. > > > > > > > > -Ry > > > > > > > > czw., 12 wrz 2019, 16:17 użytkownik Jarek Potiuk < Jarek. Potiuk@ > > > > polidea. com ( jarek.pot...@polidea.com ) > napisał: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fantastic! Strong +1 from me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To alleviate some of the concerns - we @Polidea are just starting a > > > > > project for big and serious customer where we will most likely use > and > > > > > extend Kubernetes Operator. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have 3 people that could become contributors and commiters day > one, > > > so > > > > > we can already help building community for it. Looking forward to > > > > > following the Apache way in this case ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:23 AM Tao Feng < fengtao04@ gmail. com ( > > > > > fengta...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 as well. One question: does the original author still actively > > > > maintain > > > > >> or would like to continue maintaining the code base after the > repo is > > > > >> moved > > > > >> > > > > >> to Airflow? > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:10 PM Sumit Maheshwari < sumeet. manit@ > > > > gmail. com > > > > >> ( sumeet.ma...@gmail.com ) > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Strong +1 > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > aizhamal@ > > > > apache. > > > > >>> org ( aizha...@apache.org ) > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Hello Airflow community, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Over the last year, an engineer at Google developed, and open > > > sourced > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> a > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Kubernetes operator to run Airflow[1]. Anyone can use it to > deploy > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Airflow > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> on their k8s cluster freely. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> There have been discussions among community members that it > would be > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> great > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> to donate the operator to Apache to be part of Airflow. That > way it > > > is > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> easy > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> to accept contributions from the community, improve and > maintain it > > > > >>>> collectively and transparently, along with the Airflow-k8s > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> integration. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> This idea has been discussed at Google, and we have obtained all > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> necessary > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> approvals to donate the operator. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> This discussion is to gather opinions from the community > whether you > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> all > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> think that it is a good idea. I personally think that this > would be > > > a > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> great > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> addition to Airflow. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Please express your thoughts or concerns if you have any. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> The discussion will run for 72 hours, and if there is consensus > on > > > > >>>> accepting the donation, we will move the code under the Apache > > > > >>>> organization, to be owned by the Airflow community. If > consensus is > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> not > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> evident, we can have a vote after this discussion. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Aizhamal > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent via Superhuman ( https://sprh.mn/?vip=r...@rywalker.com ) > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:19 AM, Jarek Potiuk < > > > jarek.pot...@polidea.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The name is indeed misleading. My proposal would be > > > > > k8s-operator-for-airflow - this might make it unambiguous . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > czw., 12 wrz 2019, 16:17 użytkownik Jarek Potiuk < Jarek. Potiuk@ > > > > polidea. > > > > > com ( jarek.pot...@polidea.com ) > napisał: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> Fantastic! Strong +1 from me. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> To alleviate some of the concerns - we @Polidea are just starting > a > > > > >> project for big and serious customer where we will most likely > use and > > > > >> extend Kubernetes Operator. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> We have 3 people that could become contributors and commiters day > one, > > > > so > > > > >> we can already help building community for it. Looking forward to > > > > >> following the Apache way in this case ! > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> J. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:23 AM Tao Feng < fengtao04@ gmail. com > ( > > > > >> fengta...@gmail.com ) > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> +1 as well. One question: does the original author still actively > > > > maintain > > > > >>> or would like to continue maintaining the code base after the > repo is > > > > >>> moved > > > > >>> to Airflow? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:10 PM Sumit Maheshwari < sumeet. > manit@ > > > > gmail. com > > > > >>> ( sumeet.ma...@gmail.com ) > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Strong +1 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > aizhamal@ > > > > apache. > > > > >>>> org ( aizha...@apache.org ) > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Hello Airflow community, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Over the last year, an engineer at Google developed, and open > > > sourced > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> a > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Kubernetes operator to run Airflow[1]. Anyone can use it to > deploy > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Airflow > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> on their k8s cluster freely. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> There have been discussions among community members that it > would > > > be > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> great > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> to donate the operator to Apache to be part of Airflow. That > way it > > > > is > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> easy > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> to accept contributions from the community, improve and > maintain it > > > > >>>>> collectively and transparently, along with the Airflow-k8s > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> integration. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> This idea has been discussed at Google, and we have obtained > all > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> necessary > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> approvals to donate the operator. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> This discussion is to gather opinions from the community > whether > > > you > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> all > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> think that it is a good idea. I personally think that this > would > > > be a > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> great > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> addition to Airflow. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Please express your thoughts or concerns if you have any. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> The discussion will run for 72 hours, and if there is > consensus on > > > > >>>>> accepting the donation, we will move the code under the Apache > > > > >>>>> organization, to be owned by the Airflow community. If > consensus is > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> not > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> evident, we can have a vote after this discussion. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>> Aizhamal > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> [1] https:/ / github. com/ GoogleCloudPlatform/ > airflow-operator ( > > > > >>>>> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/airflow-operator ) > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
