Hi > For the governance I am happy to be added to the OWNERS list and I think > Daniel will be happy as well :).
Feel free to submit a pull request so that I can approve directly. > [...] then official release of the helm chart needs to be voted by the PMC Hum, as of today, each approved PR result in a new version. I am not sure if this would be feasible to have a vote for each PR. But, I agree for major airflow update, it makes sense to have such a vote. Feel free to comment on your understanding of the helm/charts workflow.? > I will make sure to review this. Once I get POC in the stage that all tests > pass (for now I still have mysql tests failing) I will review and point out > the differences between Puckel and the official image and will try to > either bring the missing parts in, or document the changes. Great ! > we might likely support three executors in the improved helm chart :). Even greater ! > I think overall it's not worth supporting multiple base images - as it will > add a lot of complexity to the Image/build process with rather limited > benefits. Agreed :) Looking forward into working on this new chapter for the airflow chart :) Gaetan
