Hello Gaetan, Just to let you know (and keep you informed) - the "AIP-26 - Production-ready Airflow Docker Image and helm chart <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-26+-+Production-ready+Airflow+Docker+Image+and+helm+chart>" is now approved and I am working on it. I split it into 12 smaller PRs out of which 8 are already merged. I addressed a number of problems and make some improvements and cleanups to make it more manageable and simpler to build together with the CI images. And I will make it truly "official' image in DockerHub :).
I am also planning to test it automatically within our Kubernetes tests as next step and then will switch to looking at integrating it with the official helm chart and writing some documentation. We also have a placeholder foreseen at the new Airflow Website (version for final review https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/) - there will be section about installing Airflow using the helm chart. Actually - for the website - we need to have a short - one/two paragraph description on how and why you would install Airflow on Kubernetes (with the Helm chart I presume). It will link to the helm chart's README eventually, but we need some short description/explanation on the page and maybe you could write one or two paragraphs there :) (or point us to some text we could use)? Here is the link to the comment in the document with the copy: - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y4jBjtQ13zeLZ2e3V4foa51pN-168p1DHJ5zc7cbyGg/edit?disco=AAAADwXz1lQ . J. On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:17 AM Gaetan Semet <gae...@xeberon.net> wrote: > Hi > > For the governance I am happy to be added to the OWNERS list and I think > > Daniel will be happy as well :). > > Feel free to submit a pull request so that I can approve directly. > > > [...] then official release of the helm chart needs to be voted by the > PMC > > Hum, as of today, each approved PR result in a new version. I am not sure > if this would be feasible to have a vote for each PR. But, I agree for > major > airflow update, it makes sense to have such a vote. Feel free to comment > on your understanding of the helm/charts workflow.? > > > I will make sure to review this. Once I get POC in the stage that all > tests > > pass (for now I still have mysql tests failing) I will review and point > out > > the differences between Puckel and the official image and will try to > > either bring the missing parts in, or document the changes. > > Great ! > > > we might likely support three executors in the improved helm chart :). > > Even greater ! > > > I think overall it's not worth supporting multiple base images - as it > will > > add a lot of complexity to the Image/build process with rather limited > > benefits. > > Agreed :) > > Looking forward into working on this new chapter for the airflow chart :) > Gaetan > -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
