+1 for integrations and backends, it's a good start ;) T.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 12:16 PM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> wrote: > Since I am going to start working on it soon - I'd love to get some > opinions :). > > J. > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:13 AM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> > wrote: > > > I have a concrete proposal that we can start with. It's not a final set > of > > markers we might want to have but one that we can start with and make an > > immediate use of. > > > > I would like to adapt our tests to be immediately usable in Breeze (and > > tied with it) and follow this approach: > > > > *Proposed Breeze changes:* > > > > - `./breeze` by default will start only the main 'airflow-testing' > > image. This way no huge resource usage will be needed when breeze is > > started by default > > - './breeze --all-integrations` will start all dependent images (so we > > will be able to run all tests) > > - './breeze --integrations [kubernetes,cassandra,mongo, > > rabbitmq,redis,openldap,kerberos] - you will be able to choose which > > integrations you want to start > > - When you run `breeze --backend postgres` it will only start postgres > > not mysql and the other way round. > > > > *Proposed Pytest marks:* > > > > - > > > pytest.mark.integrations('kubernetes'),pytest.mark.integrations('cassandra'),..... > > - pytest,mark.backends("postgres"), pytest,mark.backends("mysql"), > > pytest.mark.backends("sqlite") > > > > It's very easy to add custom switches to pytest and auto-detect what is > > the default setting based on environment variables for example. We could > > follow > > > https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/example/markers.html#custom-marker-and-command-line-option-to-control-test-runs > > . > > > > *Proposed Pytest behaviour:* > > > > - `pytest` -> in Breeze will run all tests that are applicable within > > the current environment: > > - it will only run non-marked tests by default, applicable with > > current selected backend > > - when (for example) you stared cassandra is added it will > > additionally run pytest.mark.integrations('cassandra') > > - `pytest` in local environment by default will only run non-marked > > tests > > - `pytest --integrations [kubernetes, ....]` will only run the > > integration tests selected (will convert the switch into the > corresponding > > markers (as explained in the example above) > > - `pytest --backends [postgres| mysql | sqlite] will only run the > > specific tests that use postgres/mysql/sqlite specific tests > > > > *What we will achieve by that:* > > > > - lower resource usage by Breeze by default (while allowing to run > > most of the tests) > > - easy selection of integration(s) we want to test > > - easy way to run all tests to reproduce CI run > > - capability of running just 'pytest' and testing (as fast as > > possible) all the tests that are applicable in your environment (if > you > > want to be extra-sure everything works - for example during > refactoring) > > - in the future we might be able to optimise CI and run smaller set of > > tests for postgres/mysql/sqlite 'only' cases - optimising the time > for CI > > builds. > > > > > > If I will get a general "OK" from community for that - I can make a set > of > > incremental changes to breeze (as I continue working on prod image) and > add > > those capabilities to Breeze. > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:10 AM Kamil Breguła <kamil.breg...@polidea.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> It is worth adding that we currently use test marking in the project. > For > >> this purpose, we use the prefix "_system.py" in the file name. > >> Unit tests: > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/tests/operators/test_gcs_to_gcs.py > >> System tests: > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/tests/operators/test_gcs_to_gcs_operator_system.py > >> Elsewhere, a special directory structure is used. > >> Unit tests: > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/master/tests/kubernetes > >> Integration tests: > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/master/tests/integration/kubernetes > >> > >> This will allow us to limit e.g. mocking in system tests. > >> This seems to be a clearer solution because it clearly separates each > type > >> of test. If we add markers, they may not be noticed when making changes > >> and > >> review. The file name is immediately visible. > >> Recently I dealt with such a case that system tests included mocking, > >> which > >> by definition did not work. > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/11262c6d42c4612890a6eec71783e0a6d5b22c17 > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:22 PM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I am all-in for markers. > >> > > >> > I think we should start with small set of useful markers, which should > >> have > >> > a useful purpose from the beginning and implement them first - to > learn > >> how > >> > useful they are (before we decide on full set of markers). > >> > Otherwise maintaining those markers will become a fruitless "chore" > and > >> it > >> > might be abandoned. > >> > > >> > So my proposal is to agree the first top cases we want to handle with > >> > markers and then define/apply the markers accordingly: > >> > > >> > Those are my three top priorities (from most important to least): > >> > > >> > - Splitting out the Integration tests (and updating Breeze) so that > >> you > >> > choose which integration you start when you start Breeze rather > than > >> > start > >> > them all. > >> > - DB separation so that we do not repeat non-DB tests on all > >> Databases. > >> > - Proper separation of Kubernetes tests (They are now filtered out > >> based > >> > on skipif/env variables. > >> > > >> > > >> > J. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 1:32 PM Tomasz Urbaszek < > >> > tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi everyone, > >> > > > >> > > Since we run our tests using pytest we are able to use test markers > >> [1]. > >> > > Using them will give > >> > > use some useful things: > >> > > - additional information of test type (ex. when used for system > test) > >> > > - easy way to select test by types (ex. pytest -v -m "not system") > >> > > - way to split our test suite in more effective way (no need to run > >> all > >> > > tests on 3 backends) > >> > > > >> > > I would like to discuss what "official" marks would we like to use. > >> As a > >> > > base I would suggests > >> > > to mark tests as: > >> > > - system - tests that need the outside world to be successful (ex. > GCP > >> > > system tests) > >> > > - db[postgres, sqlite, mysql] - tests that require database to be > >> > > successful, in other words, > >> > > tests that create some db side effects > >> > > - integration - tests that requires some additional resources like > >> > > Cassandra or Kubernetes > >> > > > >> > > All other, unmarked tests would be treated as "pure" meaning that > they > >> > have > >> > > no side effects > >> > > (at least on database level). > >> > > > >> > > What do you think about this? Does anyone have some experience with > >> using > >> > > markers in > >> > > such a big project? > >> > > > >> > > [1] http://doc.pytest.org/en/latest/example/markers.html > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Bests, > >> > > Tomek Urbaszek > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > Jarek Potiuk > >> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > >> > > >> > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > >> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Jarek Potiuk > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > > > > > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> >