Bumping this thread again to get more responses. On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 5:13 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all, > > From my perspective the following sections could be better: > - how to on cross DAG dependencies, best practises, watchouts etc (I > should be able to contribute something over next weekend) > - configuration settings - it would be lovely to have not only > technical description of a setting but also suggestion on how to > adjust it, how it will impact the deployment etc. > > And if I'm not mistaken we are missing a nice "best practices for your > Airflow" that would help use and manage their Airflows in "best" way. > For example section on monitoring Airflow deployments (not a list of > metrics) would be appreciated by users. > > Cheers, > Tomek > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:44 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > One of the thing that we skipped in last Airflow 2.0 dev was around > > "documentation". The main reason for skipping it in the meeting was to > > gather good data-points and feedbacks from the community. > > > > So my question to everyone reading this email is "What improvements do > you > > want in the docs on http://airflow.apache.org/docs/stable/ "?: > > > > - What is it that we are missing there? > > - What is that is "outdated" > > - Better organization? Any ideas? > > - Is there something that can be simplified? > > - Where would you prefer docs for "Docker Image" and "Helm Chart" (yet > > to be officially released)? > > > > Feedback from someone who has just recently started looking at Airflow > > would be very much appreciated since you would know what challenges you > > faced while using Airflow for the first time. > > > > Regards, > > Kaxil > > > > -- > > Tomasz Urbaszek > Polidea | Software Engineer > > M: +48 505 628 493 > E: tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com > > Unique Tech > Check out our projects! >
