Hi team, We are very glad to see the introduction of TaskGroup in Airflow 2.0 and really like it. Thanks to Yu Qian and everyone that contributed to it. To continue moving towards the goal of replacing SubDagOperator with TaskGroup, I'd like to kick off a discussion on bringing TaskGroup into Tree View.
*Why do we need TaskGroup in Tree View?* For owners of larger DAGs, say a DAG with 500 tasks, Tree View is the preferred view for its loading speed and simpler representation. SubDagOperator is often used to provide an isolated view into a subset of tasks in such large DAGs. To replace such SubDag use cases, TaskGroup will need to support Tree View. *What should TaskGroup look like in Tree View**?* We didn't have a conclusion during the 1st iteration of TaskGroup. In Airbnb, we use SubDag mostly for providing a zoom in view on a small set of tasks and the SubDag zoom in feature worked well for us. We'd like to see TaskGroup provide a zoom in option for both Graph View and Tree View but also like to hear everyone's thoughts. *What needs to be in TaskGroup and what doesn't?* TaskGroup started off as a pure UI concept while SubDag is something more, e.g. it has its own DagRun thus isolated scheduling decisions, it can serve as a logical isolation layer that holds different sets of DAG level params, etc. While we only use SubDag as a UI feature, I think it would be a good opportunity for us to discuss what should be TaskGroup and what shouldn't. Please don't hesitate to share your thoughts. Cheers, Kevin Y
