+1. I think it's a good idea, that will gently guide our users to change their (bad) habits in DAG authoring, especially when accompanied with "equivalent behaviour" explanation.
J. On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 2:03 AM Daniel Standish <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > Hi > > I would like to call a vote on the following proposal: > > Helper function `days_ago` is to be deprecated (warning of pending removal > with each call) with removal targeted for 3.0. The deprecation warning > should guide user and perhaps point to some documentation concerning how to > maintain the equivalent behavior. Until removal we should not change the > behavior of the function (apart from the warnings). > > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/bjtdrjztr0mrgwlkvmgpcwdssjc7mqkv > > This vote will last for 7 days (until 2022-02-10 01:00 UTC), and until at > least 3 binding votes have been cast. > > Thanks > > Daniel >
