+1 (binding) just to be precise. On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 1:46 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> +1. I think it's a good idea, that will gently guide our users to change > their (bad) habits in DAG authoring, especially when accompanied with > "equivalent behaviour" explanation. > > J. > > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 2:03 AM Daniel Standish > <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I would like to call a vote on the following proposal: >> >> Helper function `days_ago` is to be deprecated (warning of pending >> removal with each call) with removal targeted for 3.0. The deprecation >> warning should guide user and perhaps point to some documentation >> concerning how to maintain the equivalent behavior. Until removal we >> should not change the behavior of the function (apart from the warnings). >> >> Discussion thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/bjtdrjztr0mrgwlkvmgpcwdssjc7mqkv >> >> This vote will last for 7 days (until 2022-02-10 01:00 UTC), and until >> at least 3 binding votes have been cast. >> >> Thanks >> >> Daniel >> >
