> I agree with Jed. I don't actually mind allowing contribution of any > config/section but I think any conflicts discovered should fail very loudly.
Agreed. Implemented. Merged :) On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:01 PM Oliveira, Niko <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with Jed. I don't actually mind allowing contribution of any > config/section but I think any conflicts discovered should fail very loudly. > > ________________________________ > From: Jed Cunningham <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 7:45:02 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][DISCUSS] Contributing "core" options by providers > configuration ? > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > > I don't necessarily mind providers adding options to existing sections, but > I can see the appeal and simplicity of enforcing it at the section level. > > Either way, I think in the case of multiple, it should fail loudly, not > just warn. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
