+1 (non-binding)

Tested our example DAGS, looks good!

Regards,
Rahul Vats
9953794332


On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 11:09, Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
> tested several of my dags. looks good!
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 7:35 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Checked #33403 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33403>, #33401 <
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33401>, #33196 <
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33196>, #33424 <
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33424>.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Sep 5, 2023, at 12:09 PM, Pankaj Koti <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
> .INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Checked that my set of changes are included and they work fine.
> > > Run a few example DAGs and they work fine too.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Pankaj Koti
> > >
> > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
> > > Location: Pune, India
> > >
> > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
> > >
> > > Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
> > >
> > > Mobile: +91 9730079985
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:58 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding): checked signatures, licences, checksums, sources - all
> > looks
> > >> good. Run a few DAGs - with Local and Celery executors. Checked that
> > all my
> > >> changes in 2.7.1  are in the packges (mostly dependency related). lt
> all
> > >> looks good to me.
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 10:31 PM Ephraim Anierobi <
> > >> ephraimanier...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hey fellow Airflowers,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have cut Airflow 2.7.1rc2. This email is calling a vote on the
> > release,
> > >>> which will last at least 68 hours(accelerated voting), Monday,
> > September
> > >> 4,
> > >>> 2023, at 08:30 pm UTC
> > >>> until Thursday, September 7, 2023, at 4:30 pm UTC
> > >>> <
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=8&iso=20230907T1630&p1=1440
> > >>>> ,
> > >>> and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> > >>>
> > >>> The status of testing of the release is kept at
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34065
> > >>>
> > >>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > >>>
> > >>> Airflow 2.7.1rc2 is available at:
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/2.7.1rc2/
> > >>>
> > >>> *apache-airflow-2.7.1-source.tar.gz* is a source release that comes
> > with
> > >>> INSTALL instructions.
> > >>> *apache-airflow-2.7.1.tar.gz* is the binary Python "sdist" release.
> > >>> *apache_airflow-2.7.1-py3-none-any.whl* is the binary Python wheel
> > >> "binary"
> > >>> release.
> > >>>
> > >>> Public keys are available at:
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote accordingly:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 approve
> > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >>>
> > >>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the
> > community
> > >>> are encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >>>
> > >>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md\#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > >>>
> > >>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> RC
> > is
> > >>> described in:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md\#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Please note that the version number excludes the `rcX` string, so
> it's
> > >> now
> > >>> simply 2.7.1. This will allow us to rename the artifact without
> > modifying
> > >>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > >>>
> > >>> Release Notes:
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/2.7.1rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.rst
> > >>>
> > >>> Changes since 2.7.1rc1:
> > >>> *Misc/Internal*
> > >>> Bring back Pydantic 1 compatibility (#34081)
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Ephraim
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to