+1 non binding

I tested some of my example dags on the RC. Things seem to work fine.

Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023, 14:35 Avi <abhishek.bha...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 non binding
>
> > On Wednesday, Sep 06, 2023 at 09:01, Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr
> (mailto:huss...@awala.fr)> wrote:
> > +1 (binding) Tested my changes and ran some testing dags.
> >
> > On Wed 6 Sep 2023 at 08:23, Phani Kumar <phani.ku...@astronomer.io
> .invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non binding
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 11:16 AM Rahul Vats <rah.sharm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Tested our example DAGS, looks good!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Rahul Vats
> > > > 9953794332
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 11:09, Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > tested several of my dags. looks good!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 7:35 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Checked #33403 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33403>,
> > > #33401
> > > > <
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33401>, #33196 <
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33196>, #33424 <
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/33424>.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Wei
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sep 5, 2023, at 12:09 PM, Pankaj Koti <
> > > pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
> > > > > .INVALID>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Checked that my set of changes are included and they work fine.
> > > > > > > Run a few example DAGs and they work fine too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pankaj Koti
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
> > > > > > > Location: Pune, India
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mobile: +91 9730079985
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:58 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (binding): checked signatures, licences, checksums,
> sources -
> > > all
> > > > > > looks
> > > > > > > > good. Run a few DAGs - with Local and Celery executors.
> Checked
> > > that
> > > > > > all my
> > > > > > > > changes in 2.7.1 are in the packges (mostly dependency
> related).
> > > lt
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > > looks good to me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 10:31 PM Ephraim Anierobi <
> > > > > > > > ephraimanier...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hey fellow Airflowers,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have cut Airflow 2.7.1rc2. This email is calling a vote
> on the
> > > > > > release,
> > > > > > > > > which will last at least 68 hours(accelerated voting),
> Monday,
> > > > > > September
> > > > > > > > 4,
> > > > > > > > > 2023, at 08:30 pm UTC
> > > > > > > > > until Thursday, September 7, 2023, at 4:30 pm UTC
> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=8&iso=20230907T1630&p1=1440
> > > > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > > and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The status of testing of the release is kept at
> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/34065
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Airflow 2.7.1rc2 is available at:
> > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/2.7.1rc2/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-2.7.1-source.tar.gz* is a source release
> that
> > > comes
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > INSTALL instructions.
> > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-2.7.1.tar.gz* is the binary Python "sdist"
> > > release.
> > > > > > > > > *apache_airflow-2.7.1-py3-none-any.whl* is the binary
> Python
> > > wheel
> > > > > > > > "binary"
> > > > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members
> of the
> > > > > > community
> > > > > > > > > are encouraged to test the release and vote with
> "(non-binding)".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md\#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to
> test
> > > this
> > > > > RC
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > described in:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md\#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the `rcX`
> string, so
> > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > now
> > > > > > > > > simply 2.7.1. This will allow us to rename the artifact
> without
> > > > > > modifying
> > > > > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Release Notes:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/2.7.1rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.rst
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Changes since 2.7.1rc1:
> > > > > > > > > *Misc/Internal*
> > > > > > > > > Bring back Pydantic 1 compatibility (#34081)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > Ephraim
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to