Oh! Yes I agree

> and has been since it’s release in 2.6

Misunderstood. Thought it was only released a few months ago. Time flies!

+1 (non-binding)

> On Sep 8, 2023, at 3:44 PM, Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> What’s the motivation to remove this now?
> 
> The feature was introduced in Airflow 2.3.0 (1 year and five months ago);
> IMHO, this period is more than sufficient to apply all possible changes to
> the design or decide to remove the feature.
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 9:30 PM <consta...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> What’s the motivation to remove this now?
>> 
>>>> On Sep 8, 2023, at 2:55 AM, Cody Rich <codytr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>> 
>>> I'm calling a lazy consensus for removing the experimental tag for the
>>> pluggy interface (pr #34174 <
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34174>).
>>> It's currently denoted as experimental and has been since its release in
>>> 2.6.  Since its release it has been pretty stable and after doing a quick
>>> search of the Issues in Github and in the slack channel, I didn't see any
>>> problems reported.
>>> 
>>> This lazy consensus will conclude Friday, September 15th at 12:00pm
>> (EDT).
>>> 
>>> (This is my 1st lazy consensus, so please let me know if I'm missing
>>> anything!)
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cody
>>> --
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
>> 
>> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org

Reply via email to