Asked because if it never was an experimental feature, then it can't be just removed until Airflow 3 which might never happen. In this case the vote should be canceled, and we need to continue to discuss moving it to a separate provider and suspend/remove the newly created provider.
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 at 00:02, Andrey Anshin <andrey.ans...@taragol.is> wrote: > I just wonder if `Experimental` is covered by > https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/release-process.html#experimental-features > ? > Or is it just another meaning of Experimental ? > > > > > On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 at 23:39, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > >> Would you still vote `-1` of course was the question. >> >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 8:37 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: >> >> > Question: Jed, Ash: Would you still vote If we move it to provider (with >> > status "removed from maintenance except security fixes" - same as we did >> > with daskexecutor? >> > >> > J. >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 8:25 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >> As much as I would love to remove it I'm with Jed: if it worked on 2.0 >> it >> >> should work on all 2.x >> >> >> >> My vote is -1 >> >> >> >> On 16 March 2024 19:08:13 GMT, Jed Cunningham >> <j...@astronomer.io.INVALID> >> >> wrote: >> >> >I forgot to add the "why" - I view this as a breaking change still. >> >> >> > >> >
