As everyone above mentioned. I’m all for removing it but we should do so as part of a major breaking release. Perhaps if we haven’t already we should at least add deprecation warnings?
-1 but very down to add deprecation warnings On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 4:19 PM Bas Harenslak <b...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > -1 for me too. > > Regardless of how we treat the “experimental” status, I often still see > people using the experimental API for triggering DAGs. IMO it would be too > much of a breaking change to remove it in a minor version, so I suggest > removing it in Airflow 3. > > Bas > > > Op 16 mrt 2024 om 14:24 heeft Andrey Anshin <andrey.ans...@taragol.is> > het volgende geschreven: > > > > Asked because if it never was an experimental feature, then it can't be > > just removed until Airflow 3 which might never happen. > > In this case the vote should be canceled, and we need to continue to > > discuss moving it to a separate provider and suspend/remove the newly > > created provider. > > > > > > > >> On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 at 00:02, Andrey Anshin <andrey.ans...@taragol.is> > >> wrote: > >> I just wonder if `Experimental` is covered by > >> > https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/release-process.html#experimental-features > >> ? > >> Or is it just another meaning of Experimental ? > >>> On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 at 23:39, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > >>> Would you still vote `-1` of course was the question. > >>>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 8:37 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> > wrote: > >>>> Question: Jed, Ash: Would you still vote If we move it to provider > (with > >>>> status "removed from maintenance except security fixes" - same as we > did > >>>> with daskexecutor? > >>>> J. > >>>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 8:25 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> As much as I would love to remove it I'm with Jed: if it worked on > 2.0 > >>> it > >>>>> should work on all 2.x > >>>>> My vote is -1 > >>>>> On 16 March 2024 19:08:13 GMT, Jed Cunningham > >>> <j...@astronomer.io.INVALID> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> I forgot to add the "why" - I view this as a breaking change still. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > >
