+1 binding.

This is something we should just do even outside of the DAG versioning context 
(which we also should do, to be clear).

TP


> On Mar 26, 2024, at 02:12, Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 (non-binding)
> This is quite good, I'd thought in passing that it'd be useful to have.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Aritra Basu
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024, 10:46 PM Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hello Airflow Community,
>> 
>> I would like to start a vote on AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history.
>> 
>> You can find the AIP here:
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-64%3A+Keep+TaskInstance+try+history
>> 
>> Discussion Thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/vvm43tfchyo92hmf40fqvmq0f5845bjr
>> 
>> This is the first step in the AIP-63 DAG Versioning journey, though this
>> provides value in isolation as well:
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-63%3A+DAG+Versioning
>> 
>> The vote will last until 2024-03-28 17:30 UTC and until at least 3 binding
>> votes have been cast.
>> 
>> Consider this my binding +1.
>> 
>> Please vote accordingly:
>> 
>> [ ] + 1 approve
>> [ ] + 0 no opinion
>> [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
>> 
>> Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other members
>> of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
>> "(non-binding)".
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jed
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org

Reply via email to