+1 (binding)

On Mon 25 Mar 2024 at 19:32, Igor Kholopov <ikholo...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:28 PM Tzu-ping Chung <t...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding.
> >
> > This is something we should just do even outside of the DAG versioning
> > context (which we also should do, to be clear).
> >
> > TP
> >
> >
> > > On Mar 26, 2024, at 02:12, Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > This is quite good, I'd thought in passing that it'd be useful to have.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Aritra Basu
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024, 10:46 PM Jed Cunningham <
> jedcunning...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello Airflow Community,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to start a vote on AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history.
> > >>
> > >> You can find the AIP here:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-64%3A+Keep+TaskInstance+try+history
> > >>
> > >> Discussion Thread:
> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/vvm43tfchyo92hmf40fqvmq0f5845bjr
> > >>
> > >> This is the first step in the AIP-63 DAG Versioning journey, though
> this
> > >> provides value in isolation as well:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-63%3A+DAG+Versioning
> > >>
> > >> The vote will last until 2024-03-28 17:30 UTC and until at least 3
> > binding
> > >> votes have been cast.
> > >>
> > >> Consider this my binding +1.
> > >>
> > >> Please vote accordingly:
> > >>
> > >> [ ] + 1 approve
> > >> [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > >> [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
> > >>
> > >> Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other
> > members
> > >> of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> > >> "(non-binding)".
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Jed
> > >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to