+1 (binding) checked signatures, checksums, licences, and source code. On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 5:31 AM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 non binding > > Installed airflow from main with fab rc1 and I was able to create a few > test users with various roles, > check their rights on the elements, and run a few simple dags. > > Works fine from my end. > > Btw, @Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> there's a typo: > > *This release is only for FAB provider to be tested along with Airflow > 2.9.0rc11* > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:34 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding): checked signatures, checksums, licences, reproducibility. > > > > I build latest main `airflow` (that will become b2) as `2.9.0rc1` package > > and installed it together with apache-airflow-providers-fab `1.0.2rc1` > and > > they work nicely together. I was able to create users, authenticate, > login > > to webserver, run a few example dags. All looks good. > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:00 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > > > calling a vote on the release, > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on March > 28, > > > 2024 13:55 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > This release is only for FAB provider to be tested along with Airflow > > 2.9.0 > > > rc11 > > > > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > > provider > > > packages. > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC > is > > > described in: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > are > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is skipped because > > we > > > test the fab provider as a whole rather than specific commits. > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the > RC > > > candidates. > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > documentation > > > after the > > > RC candidates are released. > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.0.2rc1/ > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Elad Kalif > > > > > >
