Hey Pavan, Great work on this AIP. I really like the level of detail on this and especially love the sample code!
I have a nuanced +1 binding on this. I am absolutely +1 binding on Phase 1 of the approach i.e. doing this as a Standalone Provider. I strongly believe that we should focus on this as a provider for right now, iterate really quickly, and validate this, before we attempt to put this into Core Airflow. Best regards, Vikram On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 9:04 AM Ankit Chaurasia <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > *Ankit Chaurasia* > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:38 PM Josh Fell via dev <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Ooo nice! > > > > +1 binding > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:00 AM constance.astronomer.io via dev < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > On Jan 14, 2026, at 9:03 AM, Vincent Beck <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 binding > > > > > > > >> On 2026/01/14 09:41:01 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding). Exciting times > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026, 10:35 Pavankumar Gopidesu < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi Everyone, > > > >>> > > > >>> Kaxil and I would like to calling a vote on this AIP > > > >>> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=406618285 > > > >>> > > > >>> The previous discussion thread was > > > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/dgpgvoszh52vxxszmg65wmcgxnj9zwby > > > >>> > > > >>> Based on the discussion, we have parked cyclicness behaviour to the > > new > > > >>> AIP. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thank you everyone who commented on the AIP and responded on the > > > discussion > > > >>> thread. > > > >>> > > > >>> The vote will run for 5 days and last till next tuesday, the 20th > of > > > Jan > > > >>> 2026 23:30 GMT. > > > >>> > > > >>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and > > > Committers' > > > >>> votes are considered binding. > > > >>> > > > >>> Please vote accordingly > > > >>> > > > >>> [ ] +1 Approve > > > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > >>> > > > >>> Since Kaxil and I are co-authoring this, please consider this is > our > > +2 > > > >>> binding :) > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >>> Kaxil and Pavan > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
