Yes vikram and Jens, the phase 1 is completely provider changes, no core changes are involved.
We will discuss again for the next phases and what additional changes are required by learnings from the phase 1. Regards, Pavan On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 22:07, Jens Scheffler <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 binding. > > also would propose the provider thing first to be able to faster > iterate. If then HITL looping needs dependencies to core... anyway can > be changed in future. > > Great initiative, will open a lot more use cases! > > On 1/14/26 20:46, Oliveira, Niko wrote: > > +1 binding > > > > Looks great! > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2026 10:05:00 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Vikram Koka > > Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-99 Common Data Access Pattern + AI > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > > > > > AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur > externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous > ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas > certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque. > > > > > > > >> I strongly believe that we should focus on this as a provider for right > > now, iterate really quickly, and validate this, before we attempt to put > > this into Core Airflow. > > > > 100% > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 6:33 PM Vikram Koka via dev < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hey Pavan, > >> > >> Great work on this AIP. > >> I really like the level of detail on this and especially love the sample > >> code! > >> > >> I have a nuanced +1 binding on this. > >> I am absolutely +1 binding on Phase 1 of the approach i.e. doing this > as a > >> Standalone Provider. > >> > >> I strongly believe that we should focus on this as a provider for right > >> now, iterate really quickly, and validate this, before we attempt to put > >> this into Core Airflow. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Vikram > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 9:04 AM Ankit Chaurasia <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> *Ankit Chaurasia* > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:38 PM Josh Fell via dev < > >> [email protected] > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Ooo nice! > >>>> > >>>> +1 binding > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 10:00 AM constance.astronomer.io via dev < > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Jan 14, 2026, at 9:03 AM, Vincent Beck <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> +1 binding > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 2026/01/14 09:41:01 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >>>>>>> +1 (binding). Exciting times > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026, 10:35 Pavankumar Gopidesu < > >>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Kaxil and I would like to calling a vote on this AIP > >>>>>>>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=406618285 > >>>>>>>> The previous discussion thread was > >>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/dgpgvoszh52vxxszmg65wmcgxnj9zwby > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Based on the discussion, we have parked cyclicness behaviour to > >> the > >>>> new > >>>>>>>> AIP. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thank you everyone who commented on the AIP and responded on the > >>>>> discussion > >>>>>>>> thread. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The vote will run for 5 days and last till next tuesday, the 20th > >>> of > >>>>> Jan > >>>>>>>> 2026 23:30 GMT. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and > >>>>> Committers' > >>>>>>>> votes are considered binding. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Please vote accordingly > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve > >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Since Kaxil and I are co-authoring this, please consider this is > >>> our > >>>> +2 > >>>>>>>> binding :) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>> Kaxil and Pavan > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
