+1 non-binding. Verified a few example dags, it's working fine.
And Big thank you Jarek, for all the effort on this release :) Regards, Pavan On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 10:34 PM Jens Scheffler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jarek, > > Had a bit of challenges running the validation stages on the aged > descriptions, attempted in a different, clean workspace but ended up > requiring having it in /airflow... but anyway, result of my checks are: > > Airflow 2.11.1rc2 > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Reproducible package build, Licenses, > Signatures > > *Note that also the license check raised alarms which were > false-positives. But had no differences in generated packages as of > previous eamils made "git clean -xddf" before starting to check. > > Fab 1.5.4rc1: > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build, > Licenses, Signatures > > Was a bit of a challenge getting that old release with existing script > back working and tested. Attempted my usual test round via Edge Executor > and Integration Test Dag. Actually had in memory that we wanted to block > EdgeExecutor being possible to be used in 2.11.1 but is still working. > But anyway for everybody on own risk. > > So for me ... let's get this released! Hopefully last time 2.11.*! > (Validation took me almost 2 of my evenings... not counting the enormous > hours Jarek spent in making the release. Wow!) > > On 18.02.26 23:50, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > That's fine - those are all generated files, just missing (due to **old** > > release tooling from exclusions - we are not supposed to have licence for > > generated files) > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 10:50 PM Buğra Öztürk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> For apache-airflow, +1 (binding) > >> I have checked, > >> - SVN > >> - Reproducible package builds > >> - Licence > >> - Signature > >> - Checksums > >> > >> I have checked with diffoscope and see only that the `generated/` part > was > >> different. It is indeed coming from old local builds, where, in release > >> checks, we are not mentioning the cleaning generated. We have only part > >> related to cleaning the `dist/` directory. > >> > >> For providers/fab, > >> I have checked, > >> - SVN > >> - Reproducible package builds > >> - Licence > >> - Signature > >> - Checksums > >> > >> Other than the Licence check, it looks good. To double-check, I used > both > >> apache-rat-0.17 and apache-rat-0.13, as stated in the version docs and > the > >> latest. Both showed the files as unapproved. Please let me know if I > missed > >> anything. > >> ``` apache-rat-0.13 > >> Files with unapproved licenses: > >> > >> ./apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl.asc > >> ./apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl.sha512 > >> ./apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz.asc > >> ./apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz.sha512 > >> ``` > >> > >> ``` apache-rat-0.17 > >> ***************************************************** > >> Files with unapproved licenses > >> ***************************************************** > >> > >> /apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl.asc > >> /apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl.sha512 > >> /apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz.asc > >> /apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz.sha512 > >> ``` > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 2:23 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> No big deal if missing and we can explain the difference being that one > >>> file. > >>> > >>> I think it could be an artefact of switching branches. This file is > >>> generated in Airflow 3 and used to check if the file changed - in > Airflow > >>> 2's breeze it was not generated at all - because > >> provider_dependencies.json > >>> was committed to git repo. So likely what happened when you > >>> switched branches this file was "left-over". > >>> > >>> One way to check it is to run in a newly checked out repo (or > worktree). > >>> > >>> J. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 1:38 PM Shahar Epstein <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> When running the reproducible package check I got that the file > >>>> generated/provider_dependencies.json.sha256sum exists in > >>>> dist/apache_airflow-2.11.1.tar.gz but is missing its equivalent > >> asf-dist. > >>>> Did I do something wrong or is it an actual issue? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Shahar > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 2:43 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hey fellow Airflowers, > >>>>> > >>>>> I have cut Airflow 2.11.1rc2 together with accompanying FAB 1.5.4rc1. > >>>>> > >>>>> Notes:: > >>>>> * Airflow 2.11.1 only supports Python 3.10, 3.11, 3.12 - Python 3.9 > >>>> support > >>>>> is dropped (reasons > >>>>> explained in release notes) > >>>>> * we have rc2 not rc1 for Airflow as there were fab dependency issues > >>>> with > >>>>> rc1 already in PyPI, so I had to go with rc2 > >>>>> * I have accidentally published 2.11.1 in PyPI (for now I yanked it) > >>> due > >>>> to > >>>>> technical glitch during preparation (not enough memory for Docker for > >>>> yarn > >>>>> !!). If rc1 will pass testing, I will just unyank it. In case we will > >>>> have > >>>>> to cancel rc1, we will have to release 2.11.2. > >>>>> * Documentation is not yet published using the new workflow - I need > >> to > >>>>> make some modifications to fix the workflows for v2-11 branch - but I > >>> am > >>>>> close and I should be able to publish the docs tomorrow. > >>>>> > >>>>> This email is calling a vote on both - airflow and fab provider. > >>>>> > >>>>> The vote will last at least 72 hours, from Tuesday, February 17, 2026 > >>>> 0:00 > >>>>> UTC > >>>>> until Friday, February 17, 2026 0:00 UTC, and until 3 binding +1 > >> votes > >>>> have > >>>>> been received. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=8&iso=20260217T0-00&p1=1440 > >>>>> Status of testing of the release is kept in > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/62056 > >>>>> > >>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1. > >>>>> > >>>>> Airflow 2.11.1rc2 is available at: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/2.11.1rc2/ > >>>>> > >>>>> *apache-airflow-2.11.1-source.tar.gz* is a source release that comes > >>> with > >>>>> INSTALL instructions - the source file covers both Airflow and Fab. > >>>>> *apache-airflow-2.11.1.tar.gz* is the binary Python "sdist" release. > >>>>> *apache_airflow-2.11.1-py3-none-any.whl* is the binary Python wheel > >>>>> "binary" release. > >>>>> > >>>>> Docker images are available at: > >>>>> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/airflow/tags?name=2.11.1rc2 > >>>>> > >>>>> Fab provider 1.5.4rc2 is available in: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/2.11/2026-02-16/ > >>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4.tar.gz* is the binary Python > >>> "sdist" > >>>>> release. > >>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_fab-1.5.4-py3-none-any.whl* is the binary > >>>> Python > >>>>> wheel "binary" release > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Public keys are available at: > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > >>>>> > >>>>> Please vote accordingly: > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 approve > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >>>>> > >>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the > >>> community > >>>>> are encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > >>>>> > >>>>> Airflow: > >>>>> > >>>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/v2-11-stable/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > >>>>> The test procedure for contributors and members of the community who > >>>> would > >>>>> like to test this RC is described in: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/v2-11-stable/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > >>>>> Note that the way to install airflow with `pip` or `uv` (for Python > >>> 3.10) > >>>>> [uv] pip install apache-airflow==2.11.1rc2 --constraint > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/airflow/constraints-2.11.1rc2/constraints-3.10.txt > >>>>> This should install both: apache-airflow==2.11.1rc2 and > >>>>> apache-airflow-providers-fab==1.5.4rc1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the `rcX` string, so > >> it's > >>>> now > >>>>> simply 2.11.1. This will allow us to rename the artifact without > >>>> modifying > >>>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release. > >>>>> > >>>>> Release Notes: > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/2.11.1rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.rst > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> > >>>>> J. > >>>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Bugra Ozturk > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
