Big Big thanks for the proposal and the open PRs already! Looking fantastic!
+1 (binding)
And for the closing of the discussion, I fully agree that AIP-97 and 105
do not conflict but play into the same direction. I can also see a lot
infra errors w/o crashing the worker but with AIP-105 I can handle this
as well. AIP-97 can then extend. So no reason to prolong this - looking
forward having this!
On 22.04.26 22:29, Stefan Wang wrote:
Thanks Kaxil!
+1 (non-binding)
On Apr 22, 2026, at 1:27 PM, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I would like to call a vote on this AIP-105:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=406618285
The previous discussion thread was
https://lists.apache.org/thread/1n1k7jkm9f47qn5c7jf3xcgb1xhrrqn4
Thank you everyone who commented on the AIP and responded on the discussion
thread.
The vote will run for 5 days and last till next tuesday, the 27th of April
2026 20:00 GMT.
Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and Committers'
votes are considered binding.
Please vote accordingly
[ ] +1 Approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Please consider this is my +1 binding :)
Regards,
Kaxil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
