+1 (binding) I read the discussion, really like the idea and preparation looks great! Thanks Kaxil! I was a bit late to join to the discussion but love the isolation it brings while enhancing the retry logic for users
Op wo 22 apr 2026, 23:19 schreef Jens Scheffler <[email protected]>: > Big Big thanks for the proposal and the open PRs already! Looking > fantastic! > > +1 (binding) > > And for the closing of the discussion, I fully agree that AIP-97 and 105 > do not conflict but play into the same direction. I can also see a lot > infra errors w/o crashing the worker but with AIP-105 I can handle this > as well. AIP-97 can then extend. So no reason to prolong this - looking > forward having this! > > On 22.04.26 22:29, Stefan Wang wrote: > > Thanks Kaxil! > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > >> On Apr 22, 2026, at 1:27 PM, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> I would like to call a vote on this AIP-105: > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=406618285 > >> > >> The previous discussion thread was > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1n1k7jkm9f47qn5c7jf3xcgb1xhrrqn4 > >> > >> Thank you everyone who commented on the AIP and responded on the > discussion > >> thread. > >> > >> The vote will run for 5 days and last till next tuesday, the 27th of > April > >> 2026 20:00 GMT. > >> > >> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and > Committers' > >> votes are considered binding. > >> > >> Please vote accordingly > >> > >> [ ] +1 Approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >> > >> Please consider this is my +1 binding :) > >> > >> Regards, > >> Kaxil > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
