Pick the name you think it is more appropriate. Some thoughts:
<property name="x" uriOfFile="${fileName}"/> <property name="x" valueAsUri="${fileName}"/> <property name="x" locationAsUri="${fileName}"/> <property name="x" uriForLocation="${fileName}"/> Alternatively, we could have something more general that you can pass a URI and knows how to use it, but alternatively if the value if that of a file, then it construct a URI for it. <property name="x" uri="${fileName}"/> As long as we get the expected behavior I do not mind. Jose Alberto > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 April 2003 08:38 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Using files in classpath in task file="" > > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I would like for ANT to do this for me, transparently. > > > > <property name="fileurl" locationURL="${myfile}"/> > > > > or somethig like that. > > Sure, should be trivial using FileUtils#toURI together with > setLocationURL(File), I'm just not sure about the attribute name. > locationURL would imply that its value was an URL and not a location > that gets turned into an URI - at least to me. > > Hmm, uriOfLocation="${myfile}"? uriForLocation? > > Attributes are case-insensitive in Ant. > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >