Pick the name you think it is more appropriate.
Some thoughts:
<property name="x" uriOfFile="${fileName}"/>
<property name="x" valueAsUri="${fileName}"/>
<property name="x" locationAsUri="${fileName}"/>
<property name="x" uriForLocation="${fileName}"/>
Alternatively, we could have something more general that you can pass a URI
and knows how to use it, but alternatively if the value if that of a file, then
it construct a URI for it.
<property name="x" uri="${fileName}"/>
As long as we get the expected behavior I do not mind.
Jose Alberto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 April 2003 08:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Using files in classpath in task file=""
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I would like for ANT to do this for me, transparently.
> >
> > <property name="fileurl" locationURL="${myfile}"/>
> >
> > or somethig like that.
>
> Sure, should be trivial using FileUtils#toURI together with
> setLocationURL(File), I'm just not sure about the attribute name.
> locationURL would imply that its value was an URL and not a location
> that gets turned into an URI - at least to me.
>
> Hmm, uriOfLocation="${myfile}"? uriForLocation?
>
> Attributes are case-insensitive in Ant.
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>