On 08 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 16:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> What would you want to see happen with keep-alive enabled and >> failonerror set to true on an <exec> task. What will happen if the >> execution fails? > > In this the rest of the tasks in the target would not be run, and > the next target would be started. OK, I shouldn't have spoken without reading the proposal then 8-) keep-alive to me doesn't imply skip the remaining tasks from the same target when one task fails. To me it meant that all tasks would be executed, even if a previous task had failed. What you describe might then be best covered by fail-on-error at the target level. fail-on-error would be true for the tasks inside the target, but the target itself would swallow the BuildException. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
