On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 31 October 2003 15:55, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > No, it matters if the attributes in macrodef are implemented as >> > properties or if they are implemented as textual subsitutions. >> >> OK, but then this becomes the question to decide and not whether we >> need <local> in 1.6, right? > Yes
Do we need a different thread to get a wider audience? >> If they are properties, we don't need an alternative. What are the >> difficulties you expect when they are not properties? > > Only the choice of the notation. MSBuild uses $() for its properties and @() for something else - probably Item references at first glance. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
