Yes I am not a committer, but anyway ;-)
[X] as $(x) +1
[X] as ${attribute:x} +0.5
Cannot decide between the two. But by using '$' I think
we can resolve any issues with escaping using the rules we already
have for properties. The others would require a different convention.
Jose Alberto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 November 2003 18:10
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or
> substitutions
>
>
> OK, how do we want to implement <macrodef> attributes:
> current
> [ ] as textual substitution ~ 4
> [ ] as "real" Ant properties ~ 2
>
> undecided ~ 1
>
> If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions,
> what should be the notation? (where x is the attribute name)
>
> [ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties)
> [ ] as $(x)
> [ ] as @x
> [ ] as ${attribute:x}
> [ ] as @{x}
> [ ] some thing else
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
