Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
But here we seem to be talking about a new family of generic tasks,
If this works well, we could deprecate the old tasks and eventually in a
couple of versions remove them.
Jose Alberto
generic is good, provided
-we can have a conceptual model that is consistent across all SCM
systems.
-we can deal with extensibility through antlibs. I suppose you'd have
a new type,
SCMbackend that every backend would implement; declaring a new
backend would
let you register it.
Question: could you just get away with some mixin import lib that
declared the appropriate macros for the appropriate platform?
-steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
