>As I've been hacking away today, I've been swapping a load of
>"" + "" + "" style code over to use StringBuffers. I thought
>that perhaps there's a potential use of a static method in
>StringUtils to construct these strings from an array
For a significant performance boost we had to refactor the whole (or a
major part) of the codebase in this manner. So I think a performance
test would be good. How much is the improvement on <delete>?
>StringUtils.messageAppender
> /**
> * Creates log messages using a StringBuffer
> * Example:
> * <code>
> * String[] args = {"1", "2", "3"}
> * log(StringUtils.messageAppender(args), Project.MSG_VERBOSE);
> * </code>
> * @param args the message fragments
> * @return the message
> * @since ant 1.7
> */
> public static String messageAppender(final Object[] args) {
> StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
> for (int i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
> sb.append(args[i]);
> }
> return sb.toString();
> }
This does not create a log message - it just concatenates the given
arguments.
Would be something like toString(Object[]) better?
You specify the args-param as "message fragments", so I would name the
paramter 'fragments' ;-)
public static String toString(final Object[] fragments)
...
mmmh .... alternativly you could overload the Task.log() method...
Task.log(Object[] messageFragments, int loglevel)
Jan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
