>> Then again it's these people, Peter first, who enhance Ant to >> support better models for the future, so power to you guys ;-)
Cool, so we can expect 'auto-download' to be a feature of 1.7.1? Serious, just to pull off some kind of demo implementation: is there some kind of namespace interceptor in Ant's source code? I'm just asking cause I have never seen such a beast... Regards, Wolfgang Häfelinger Research & Architecture | Dir. 2.7.0.2 European Patent Office Patentlaan 3-9 | 2288 EE Rijswijk | The Netherlands Tel. +31 (0)70 340 4931 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.epo.org "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14-11-2007 17:40 Please respond to "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org> To "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org> cc Subject Re: ApacheCon Presentation On Nov 14, 2007 9:50 AM, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 14, 2007 3:18 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2007 8:07 AM, Wolfgang Häfelinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Simple fix...place all third-party jars in $ANT_HOME/lib > > > > > > Honestly, putting something into Ant's lib directory is really ugly and all > > > those alternatives ($HOME/.ant etc) do not solve the overall problem. > > I would argue that using -lib is nearly as ugly as placing jars in $ANT_HOME/lib > (but not as bad!!) > > On projects at work, that I am involved in, I insist on > using "clean room" ant 1.7.0 and "clean room" java 1.5.* (or higher). > > For each antlib / extension that is needed, I have an ant file that > sets up the extension for-example ant-contrib. Given a corporate environment (as opposed to OSS), I believe it's entirely OK, and even A-Good-ThingTM to have an official and properly configured Ant version which is the only *official* and *sanctioned* way to run the builds, which is under source control. The allows proper control of the dependencies, and allows to manage Ant versions to be used by the different branches/versions of the software, and most importantly it's easy! Check out the proper branch of the build tools, and of the software to be built, and you're in business. Just add JDK and shake, and here you go, instant CM ;-) I'm sure your build organization rocks Peter, but I personally view it as more complex and more trouble that I was willing to live with myself (I'm not even sure I could pull such a setup off myself in fact!). Different people draw the line between the absolute ideal and the practical at different places. Having a centralized Ant under SCM was the thing for me, and obviously others find it unacceptable, and have to live with my complex setups. Then again it's these people, Peter first, who enhance Ant to support better models for the future, so power to you guys ;-) Cheers, --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
