Following up an earlier question by Justin, I have verified that all contributors to original docs repository are covered by ICLA. See comments in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-293 for details.
Thanks, Sasha On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> wrote: > That's a good point. Maybe defer this until the last possible moment > before launching the IPMC vote. It's unlikely that you'll change the > committer or PMC roster during the vote, so that ought to reduce the > likelihood of double maintenance burden. > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 1/27/16, 11:36 PM, "Thomas Weise" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Chris, > > > >Thanks, this is very helpful. I have created tickets for these items (hope > >you don't mind I made you the reporter): > > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql > >=project%20%3D%20APEXCORE%20and%20labels%20%3D%20tlp > > > >I was under the impression that the "Who We Are" page should be setup at > >time of graduation to replace the information on the status page. But if > >it > >is best practice, we will do the double maintenance ;-) > > > >Thanks again, > >Thomas > > > >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > >> I agree that it's good to start the graduation discussion, pending > >> resolution of the documentation and release items mentioned by other > >> mentors in the thread. I've been very impressed with this community's > >> level of activity and openness. > >> > >> I took a pass through the maturity model, and I'd like to call out the > >> items that may need additional work. I also have pointed out examples > >>of > >> how an existing project meets these criteria. (I used Hadoop, because > >> it's the project I know best.) > >> > >> This exercise is best done as a self-evaluation by the most involved > >> contributors, so it's possible that my perspective is incomplete. I > >> encourage more of the deeply involved community members to review the > >> maturity model in detail and draw their own conclusions. > >> > >> Also, I want to make sure it's clear that the maturity model is not an > >> absolute list of requirements. It is the community's choice on whether > >>or > >> not to address these points before a graduation proposal. However, some > >> IPMC members do use the maturity model as a checklist to gauge the > >>health > >> of a podling, so you'll bolster your case for graduation with the wider > >> IPMC if you choose to take action on them. I also think all of these > >> things are generally good for the project anyway, so it's not just a > >> matter of satisfying bureaucratic demands. > >> > >> QU30 > >> The project provides a well-documented channel to report security > >>issues, > >> along with a documented way of responding to them. > >> > >> I couldn't find a security vulnerability process documented at > >> apex.incubator.apache.org. Example: > >> http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html > >> > >> QU40 > >> The project puts a high priority on backwards compatibility and aims to > >> document any incompatible changes and provide tools and documentation to > >> help users transition to new features. > >> > >> I couldn't find backwards-compatibility guidelines documented at > >> apex.incubator.apache.org. Example: > >> > >> > http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.7.2/hadoop-project-dist/hadoop-common/Co > >>mp > >> atibility.html > >> > >> CS10 > >> The project maintains a public list of its contributors who have > >>decision > >> power -- the project's PMC (Project Management Committee) consists of > >> those contributors. > >> > >> I couldn't find a "Who We Are" page at apex.incubator.apache.org. I > >>think > >> the information is accurate in the incubation status page though. > >> Example: https://hadoop.apache.org/who.html > >> > >> CS30 > >> Documented voting rules are used to build consensus when discussion is > >>not > >> sufficient. > >> > >> I couldn't find any statement of this. Example: > >> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html > >> > >> > >> --Chris Nauroth > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 1/25/16, 2:28 PM, "Sandesh Hegde" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >+1 > >> > > >> >Code: CD50 > >> >Licenses and Copyright: LC50 > >> >Quality: QU50 > >> >Community: CO50 > >> >Independence: IN20 > >> >Releases: RE40 > >> > > >> >Thanks > >> > > >> > > >> >On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM Justin Mclean > >><[email protected]> > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> It¹s not required but you might want to rate yourself with this [1] > >> >>like a > >> >> few other projects have done. [2][3] > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Justin > >> >> > >> >> 1. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.htm > >> >>l > >> >> 2. https://zest.apache.org/community/maturity.html > >> >> 3. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/576b3c5d6a7022ac4a8df1ef118666456ce > >> >>627fb/MATURITY.adoc > >> > >> > >
