Mathias Bauer wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
(ViewData information)
Would it be difficult to make this not an implementation detail
The information stored are interresting and some already used in the
settings.xml
It wouldn't be difficult but it doesn't make sense from my point of
view. All the information can be get by an official API, why should we
make this implementation detail public. It would be redundant and we
can't adapt this string if it would be necessary in the future.
But if you feel that the existing API is to complicate we can think on
an improvement using the new UNO features maybe.
It make no sense to search in the implementation for information you
need or might be useful for you, you can't count in this info as long as
it isn't retrieved by an official API. Use the API's and if you feel
that something is missing submit a feature request or if you feel that
something is to complicate submit a request for enhancement.
Which API are you talking about?
the initial question was how to get the active cell when i remember
correctly. Maybe i was a little bit to fast for the values in the
settings.xml, i haven't checked if equivalent properties exists, i
simply have assumed this ;-) But as i already have pointed out. If
something is necessary and missing we should define an API for it but we
shouldn't simply make implementation details public.
Juergen
@Laurent: what's the use case that makes you think that you need to
evaluate this string?
Ciao,
Mathias
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
