On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Greg Stein wrote: > Given the mapping you list below, are you considering a tighter > formalization of the namespaces *within* APR? For example, all file > functions would be apr_file_* ? > > I'm -0 on that, but some targeted renames (like the one below) would be a > Good Thing.
Right now, I want to clean up the stupid functions like the one listed below. If other people want a tight formalization of function names, we can talk about that. I just really want to clean up the things that don't make any sense. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------